<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Which residuals should be evaluated for normality: Studentized, Pearson, or raw residuals? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987543#M49411</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I understand you want to check the typical normality assumptions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think PROC MIXED (to fit models with &lt;SPAN&gt;fixed and random effects)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;has "&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;conditional residuals&lt;/STRONG&gt;".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Conditional residuals are the residuals accounting for the random effects, so it helps you to evaluate the normal distribution given the random effects.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BR, Koen&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 21:13:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-07T21:13:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which residuals should be evaluated for normality: Studentized, Pearson, or raw residuals?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987403#M49408</link>
      <description>&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,0"&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,1"&gt;I have been analyzing performance data from livestock. When dealing with such data—even in blocked experimental designs—it can be challenging to determine whether an extreme laboratory result (e.g., blood urea) is a genuine analytical error (a true outlier) or simply a biological variation that causes a specific animal to stand out despite local control. This variation could even represent a direct or indirect effect of the applied treatments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-path-to-node="3,2"&gt;Given this scenario, would the most appropriate approach for assessing residual normality be to use Studentized residuals rather than Pearson or raw residuals? And why?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 13:56:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987403#M49408</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dicarlis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-06T13:56:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which residuals should be evaluated for normality: Studentized, Pearson, or raw residuals?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987471#M49409</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What model do you intend to build?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;ANOVA&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;mixed model&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;a&amp;nbsp; nonparametric alternative&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;... ??&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which SAS procedure did you use?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it a&amp;nbsp;crossover design?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR, Koen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 13:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987471#M49409</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-07T13:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which residuals should be evaluated for normality: Studentized, Pearson, or raw residuals?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987487#M49410</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;Koen&lt;BR /&gt;How're you doing?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for you awnser,&lt;BR /&gt;Usually I have used the mixed models procedure, in a randomized block design,&lt;BR /&gt;Also, in my research team, we have done a batch of trails using Latin sqare,&lt;BR /&gt;My best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:50:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987487#M49410</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dicarlis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-07T14:50:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which residuals should be evaluated for normality: Studentized, Pearson, or raw residuals?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987543#M49411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I understand you want to check the typical normality assumptions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think PROC MIXED (to fit models with &lt;SPAN&gt;fixed and random effects)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;has "&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;conditional residuals&lt;/STRONG&gt;".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Conditional residuals are the residuals accounting for the random effects, so it helps you to evaluate the normal distribution given the random effects.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BR, Koen&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 21:13:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987543#M49411</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-07T21:13:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which residuals should be evaluated for normality: Studentized, Pearson, or raw residuals?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987547#M49412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I understand. So ..., What is the correct way to assess the normality of the residuals: using the Pearson transformation, the Student's transformation, or the residuals without transformations?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Att.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 22:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987547#M49412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dicarlis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-07T22:03:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which residuals should be evaluated for normality: Studentized, Pearson, or raw residuals?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987554#M49413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Statisticians look at all of the residual plots, but tend to focus more on the studentized, Pearson, and conditional plots (especially if there are random effects in the model).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BR,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Koen&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 09:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Which-residuals-should-be-evaluated-for-normality-Studentized/m-p/987554#M49413</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-08T09:52:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

