<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How to adjust for Inter-Rater Reliability in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-to-adjust-for-Inter-Rater-Reliability/m-p/979324#M49078</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a 5-level ordinal measure taken on each patient at three different times.&amp;nbsp; A second rater scored a small subset of this data and we can compute inter-rater reliability/ies (IRR)--kappa--on this small subset of this data.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seeking input on how to incorporate the IRR data in the final analysis understanding that only a small number of measurements will have two sets of ratings?&amp;nbsp; Initial thought is to weight different segments of the scale and different time-points by their respective reliabilities--e.g., low end of the scale is more reliable than high end.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any and all thoughts and refernces are apreciated.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Haris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-21T17:17:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to adjust for Inter-Rater Reliability</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-to-adjust-for-Inter-Rater-Reliability/m-p/979324#M49078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a 5-level ordinal measure taken on each patient at three different times.&amp;nbsp; A second rater scored a small subset of this data and we can compute inter-rater reliability/ies (IRR)--kappa--on this small subset of this data.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seeking input on how to incorporate the IRR data in the final analysis understanding that only a small number of measurements will have two sets of ratings?&amp;nbsp; Initial thought is to weight different segments of the scale and different time-points by their respective reliabilities--e.g., low end of the scale is more reliable than high end.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any and all thoughts and refernces are apreciated.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-to-adjust-for-Inter-Rater-Reliability/m-p/979324#M49078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Haris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-21T17:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

