<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC POWER for Cox regression in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/967416#M48608</link>
    <description>Thank you both &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18408"&gt;@Ksharp&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15363"&gt;@SteveDenham&lt;/a&gt; I think I need to supplement my mathematical statistics basis before I can dig deeper into this issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 08:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomHsiung</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-25T08:58:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC POWER for Cox regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/966685#M48579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, guys&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You suggestion is precious.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To estimate the sample size, we need a value of R^2. I don't know how do we get that R^2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;An example&amp;nbsp;script is:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc power;
   coxreg
      hazardratio = 1.6
      rsquare = 0.2
      stddev = 1.1
      power = 0.9
      eventstotal = .
   ;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The definition of R^2 is:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 10.30.44 PM.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/106981iAEC3F295E49FB017/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 10.30.44 PM.png" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 10.30.44 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 14:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/966685#M48579</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomHsiung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-16T14:33:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC POWER for Cox regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/966754#M48580</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think it is just like R-Square of PROC REG and GLM .&lt;BR /&gt;r-square= 1 - uss(residual)/css(y) ;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.sas.com/kb/60/162.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://support.sas.com/kb/60/162.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 00:59:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/966754#M48580</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-22T00:59:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC POWER for Cox regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/967155#M48601</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One nice feature of PROC POWER is its ability to give power or sample size estimates for a variety of values of the various parameters. In this case, you may want to look at several values for Rsq, to see how sensitive sample size (or power) is to this value. If it turns out that the result is not too sensitive to changes in Rsq, then you can use the standard formula that&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18408"&gt;@Ksharp&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;gave. If it is otherwise, then you need to look at other estimators for Rsq that reduce bias.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 18:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/967155#M48601</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-21T18:42:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC POWER for Cox regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/967416#M48608</link>
      <description>Thank you both &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18408"&gt;@Ksharp&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15363"&gt;@SteveDenham&lt;/a&gt; I think I need to supplement my mathematical statistics basis before I can dig deeper into this issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 08:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-POWER-for-Cox-regression/m-p/967416#M48608</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomHsiung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-25T08:58:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

