<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Correlation analysis in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947479#M47380</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There are simple ways, and more complete ways. For the simple way try:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc ttest data=your_data;&lt;BR /&gt;by&amp;nbsp;question;&lt;BR /&gt;class&amp;nbsp;appointment_type;&lt;BR /&gt;var&amp;nbsp;score;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, it appears that your data may be clustered by ID, with several questions for each. If there is any chance that the response within an ID is correlated, then perhaps a generalized estimating equation approach would be useful. Here is some example code:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc gee data=your_data;
class&amp;nbsp;appointment_type question ID;
model score = appointment_type question;
repeated subject=ID/ type=exch covb corrb;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You may want to include an interaction term, if you want to compare mean scores for each question. That would lead to this code:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc gee data=your_data;
class&amp;nbsp;appointment_type question ID;
model score = appointment_type question appointment_type*question;
repeated subject=ID/ type=exch covb corrb;
lsmeans appointment_type*question;
slice appointment_type*question / diff sliceby=question;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope some of this helps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 13:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-15T13:51:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947407#M47375</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;I posted this question earlier but didnt get what i needed so reposting it.&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;It is seen that the rating for Established patients was very high for the questions. ( All the data is not shown)&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;We waned to see for which "questions" between the two groups ( established or NEW) there was a statistically significant difference???&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Please let me know how can we solve this&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;Thank you&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ID&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; DOMAIN&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; QUESTION&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SCORE&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; APPOINTMENT_TYPE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;101&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Care Provider&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: CP Concern&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Estblished&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;101&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Care Provider&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: CP Explanation&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Estblished&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;101&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Care Provider&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: CP Discuss treatments&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Estblished&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;101&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Care Provider&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: CP Efforts&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Estblished&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;101&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Access&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Med Practice: Ease of contacting&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Estblished&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;101&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Access&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Ease of scheduling&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Estblished&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;101&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Access&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Med Practice: CP Efforts&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Estblished&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;102 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Care Provider&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: CP Concern&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; New&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;102&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Care Provider&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: CP Explanation&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;New&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;102&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Care Provider&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: CP Discuss treatments&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; New&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;102&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Care Provider&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: CP Efforts&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; New&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;102&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Access&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Med Practice: Ease of contacting&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; New&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;102&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Access&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Ease of scheduling&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; New&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;102 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Med Practice: Access&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Med Practice: CP Efforts&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;100&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; New&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947407#M47375</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-14T18:29:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947408#M47376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which two groups do you mean?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Statistically different based on what statistical test?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:38:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947408#M47376</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-14T17:38:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947410#M47377</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;THE TWO groups are : under Appointment_Type variable.&lt;BR /&gt;Established and NEW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am guessing it will be a correlation procedure. I might be wrong!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:06:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947410#M47377</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-14T18:06:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947434#M47378</link>
      <description>Since your question is about STAT, better post it at stat forum:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/bd-p/statistical_procedures" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/bd-p/statistical_procedures&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Let more statistical experts to see it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13633"&gt;@StatDave&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13758"&gt;@lvm&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15363"&gt;@SteveDenham&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/60873"&gt;@jiltao&lt;/a&gt; ........</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 01:43:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947434#M47378</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-15T01:43:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947472#M47379</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Correlation not usually used to show "statistically different".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you describe in words what comparison of the data you are thinking about? Please provide enough detail so we can follow along.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:58:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947472#M47379</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-15T10:58:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947479#M47380</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are simple ways, and more complete ways. For the simple way try:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc ttest data=your_data;&lt;BR /&gt;by&amp;nbsp;question;&lt;BR /&gt;class&amp;nbsp;appointment_type;&lt;BR /&gt;var&amp;nbsp;score;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, it appears that your data may be clustered by ID, with several questions for each. If there is any chance that the response within an ID is correlated, then perhaps a generalized estimating equation approach would be useful. Here is some example code:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc gee data=your_data;
class&amp;nbsp;appointment_type question ID;
model score = appointment_type question;
repeated subject=ID/ type=exch covb corrb;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You may want to include an interaction term, if you want to compare mean scores for each question. That would lead to this code:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc gee data=your_data;
class&amp;nbsp;appointment_type question ID;
model score = appointment_type question appointment_type*question;
repeated subject=ID/ type=exch covb corrb;
lsmeans appointment_type*question;
slice appointment_type*question / diff sliceby=question;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope some of this helps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 13:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947479#M47380</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-15T13:51:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947483#M47382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Steve, Thank you for the code and explanation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We noticed that there is a good rating score given for the questions in the Established category compared to the NEW and we did a TTEST of the averge score per ID between the two groups and found to be statistically significnt.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now we are trying to find if the Established versus NEW groups had any correlation for the questions they answered.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example : IF Med Practice: CP Discuss treatments question score was significantly different between the two groups.....or if other question did etc. etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would PROC GEE still a good procedure for this kind of analysis?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you, again&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:25:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947483#M47382</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-15T14:25:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947490#M47383</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it would. It would enable you to account for correlation within ID as well as the correlation/covariance across ID's.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:36:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947490#M47383</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-15T14:36:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947491#M47384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ID is the patient ID and each patient takes the survey and gives the score for each question in the domain(s).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When we look for any correlation like in our study trying to find which question did the Established favor more ( since we know Established had high Mean scores), do we need to use ID in the PROC GEE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also would you share a document to interpret the results ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the result after using PROC GEE. Does this say anything ? If there was a difference for any of the questions each group answered?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="robertrao_0-1729004093705.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/101227i6EE537DC857C93A8/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="robertrao_0-1729004093705.png" alt="robertrao_0-1729004093705.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:56:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947491#M47384</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-15T14:56:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Correlation analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947737#M47410</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see the solution vector, but the sliced least squares mean differences are what would address your research question.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:48:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Correlation-analysis/m-p/947737#M47410</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-16T18:48:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

