<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC GLIMMIX not giving AIC after adding random effect in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-not-giving-AIC-after-adding-random-effect/m-p/932760#M46510</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;PROC GLIMMIX uses the Pseudo-likelihood estimation method to fit the model when there is a random effect, so no AIC is computed because no true likelihood is computed. To get the AIC, you can use a different estimation method, for example, method=quad or method=laplace in the PROC GLIMMIX statement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jiltao</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-17T23:17:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC GLIMMIX not giving AIC after adding random effect</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-not-giving-AIC-after-adding-random-effect/m-p/932727#M46502</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've been using Proc Glimmix to predict the effect of several predictor variables on my outcome where the distribution is negative binomial. for the purpose of model comparision when I run the following code I receive the AIC tests:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=modelupdated;&lt;BR /&gt;class metcat(ref="2") age_new(ref="1") sexnum (ref="2") race(ref="2");&lt;BR /&gt;model Rate_12= age_new sexnum race metcat/ dist=nb link=log s;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However when I add the random effect of counties, I do not receive the AIC in fit stati table in the output.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=modelupdated1;&lt;BR /&gt;class metcat(ref="2") age_new(ref="1") sexnum(ref="2") race(ref="2");&lt;BR /&gt;model Rate_12 = age_new sexnum race ave_uninsured metcat / dist=nb link=log s;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;random intercept /type=un subject=fips_all_digit_num&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; ; &lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;any thoughts on this and how I can get AIC becuse I need to compare the two different models vs eacg other.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:39:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-not-giving-AIC-after-adding-random-effect/m-p/932727#M46502</guid>
      <dc:creator>raheleh22</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-17T19:39:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC GLIMMIX not giving AIC after adding random effect</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-not-giving-AIC-after-adding-random-effect/m-p/932760#M46510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PROC GLIMMIX uses the Pseudo-likelihood estimation method to fit the model when there is a random effect, so no AIC is computed because no true likelihood is computed. To get the AIC, you can use a different estimation method, for example, method=quad or method=laplace in the PROC GLIMMIX statement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jill&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 23:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-not-giving-AIC-after-adding-random-effect/m-p/932760#M46510</guid>
      <dc:creator>jiltao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-17T23:17:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

