<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Nonparametric  ANOVA F (MIVQUE0) for neurosciense in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-ANOVA-F-MIVQUE0-for-neurosciense/m-p/929606#M46315</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;you might want to search Mr. Google for repeated AB testing, and see how others have analyzed their results.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 14:53:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-24T14:53:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nonparametric  ANOVA F (MIVQUE0) for neurosciense</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-ANOVA-F-MIVQUE0-for-neurosciense/m-p/928257#M46223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello to community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Than you for your time, the problem is following&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I am doing classical Pavlovian human conditioning which in very general terms is changing of attitude&amp;nbsp; of a person to some stimulus.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the way to check it is simply to ask the person to rate the attitude to the symbol (in my case : the level of excitement on the scale from one to nine) .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seams&amp;nbsp; rather easy task but due to the complexity of paradigm it becomes a little bit complicated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First&amp;nbsp; we show a person two symbols: one we associate with money the other one is neutral and ask person to rate those symbols.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then we switch association and previously neutral symbol becomes associated with money and previously associated with money becomes neutral. Then we do the same, but use pain instead of money.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the end we have ratings for 8 different&amp;nbsp; associations each made by 20 participants.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my model I have 4 categorical predictors. 1. Stimulus : can be associated with pain\money, or not (CS+, CS-). 2. Stage : stimulus before switch (original) and after switch (inverted). 3. Phase: stimulus associated with money (pleasant), associated with pain (unpleasant). 4 Subjects: 20 of them, each makes 8 ratings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My very general question is: what are your advises?&amp;nbsp; More actual question is: Definitely it is a repetitive measurement, but what parameters should be treated as repetitive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Than you for your time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 10:59:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-ANOVA-F-MIVQUE0-for-neurosciense/m-p/928257#M46223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mykola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-14T10:59:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nonparametric  ANOVA F (MIVQUE0) for neurosciense</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-ANOVA-F-MIVQUE0-for-neurosciense/m-p/929606#M46315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you might want to search Mr. Google for repeated AB testing, and see how others have analyzed their results.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 14:53:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-ANOVA-F-MIVQUE0-for-neurosciense/m-p/929606#M46315</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-24T14:53:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

