<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Standard errors after matching in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914374#M45389</link>
    <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;I am using a linear regression to evaluate the impact of a treatment effect after matching (psmatch) with replacement and K:1 (k&amp;gt;1). What is the easier way to obtain robust standard errors which account for the fact that control observations are being used multiple times? Sample&amp;gt;10k.&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2024 07:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Callam1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-02-03T07:23:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Standard errors after matching</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914374#M45389</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;I am using a linear regression to evaluate the impact of a treatment effect after matching (psmatch) with replacement and K:1 (k&amp;gt;1). What is the easier way to obtain robust standard errors which account for the fact that control observations are being used multiple times? Sample&amp;gt;10k.&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2024 07:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914374#M45389</guid>
      <dc:creator>Callam1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-03T07:23:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard errors after matching</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914411#M45394</link>
      <description>There is PROC ROBUSTREG .&lt;BR /&gt;But I am doubt that if it was what you are looking for.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 02:32:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914411#M45394</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-04T02:32:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard errors after matching</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914427#M45396</link>
      <description>It would be interesting to know if it has been used to estimate the treatment effect after matching with replacement and k:1.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2024 10:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914427#M45396</guid>
      <dc:creator>Callam1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-04T10:10:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard errors after matching</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914457#M45398</link>
      <description>That is not really .&lt;BR /&gt;It don't care whether the data is "matching with replacement and k:1." or not,&lt;BR /&gt;It is just consider the high leverage point(for X variables) and outliers point(for Y variable),&lt;BR /&gt;and get rid of these point to fit a regression model (a.k.a robust mean or std ).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyway, &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13633"&gt;@StatDave&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13684"&gt;@Rick_SAS&lt;/a&gt;  maybe could give you the answer.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 01:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914457#M45398</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-05T01:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard errors after matching</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914482#M45400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I do not understand the question, so I cannot add to this discussion.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:54:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/914482#M45400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-05T10:54:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Standard errors after matching</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/916678#M45472</link>
      <description>The question is how to obtain robust standard errors when using a linear regression to estimate the impact of the treatment effect after matching with replacement and k=n, distance=pscore</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2024 13:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Standard-errors-after-matching/m-p/916678#M45472</guid>
      <dc:creator>Callam1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-18T13:09:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

