<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Combining multiply imputed complex survey data in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888203#M43994</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You would use SURVEYREG with the default VARMETHOD=TAYLOR.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 18:41:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-08-07T18:41:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Combining multiply imputed complex survey data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/887628#M43980</link>
      <description>I wish to test for linear trend across 4 categories of my outcome variable. My data come from a complex survey design. Missing data have veen imputed by proc surveyimpute procedure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could you let me know how to combine results from ‘’Contrast” statement in the proc surveyreg procedure using proc MIanalyze? I got auggestion from using Estimate statement but not sure how to test for trend using estimate statement.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 08:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/887628#M43980</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saifulinfs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-03T08:18:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combining multiply imputed complex survey data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888125#M43988</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PROC SURVEYIMPUTE generates&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;imputation-adjusted replicate weights that you then use in another survey procedure. This is different than a multiply imputed data set, so you do not need to use PROC MIANALYZE. Instead, read the imputed data into PROC SURVEYREG and specify&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the replication method for variance estimation using the VARMETHOD= option. The imputation variance will be accounted for. The &lt;A href="https://go.documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/9.4_3.5/statug/statug_surveyimpute_gettingstarted.htm" target="_self"&gt;Getting Started&lt;/A&gt; example in PROC SURVEYIMPUTE explains it well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 13:43:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888125#M43988</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-07T13:43:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combining multiply imputed complex survey data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888142#M43990</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response. Because my dataset has a mixture of continuous and class variables, I used Method=Hotdeck and Varmethod=None in my Proc Surveyimpute. This means no replicate weights were created. Only imputation-adjusted survey weights were created. In this case, do I need to use Proc MIanalyze procedure? If not, which varmethod option should I use in proc surveyreg?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please note that, I initially tried with Method=FEFI and Varmethod=Jackknife. But SAS didn't gave imputed dataset even after running the Proc SURVEYIMPUTE procedure for 48 hours. I later came to know this is because my dataset had several continuous variables in addition to class variables.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 15:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888142#M43990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saifulinfs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-07T15:07:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combining multiply imputed complex survey data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888203#M43994</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You would use SURVEYREG with the default VARMETHOD=TAYLOR.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 18:41:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888203#M43994</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-07T18:41:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combining multiply imputed complex survey data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888206#M43995</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is the code I used to generated the dataset:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;proc surveyimpute&lt;/STRONG&gt; data=zinc.otms method=hotdeck (selection=weighted) seed=123 ndonors=5;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;cluster&lt;/STRONG&gt; psu_no_ov;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;strata&lt;/STRONG&gt; newstrata;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;weight&lt;/STRONG&gt; nat_weight_bio;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;cells&lt;/STRONG&gt; sex area;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;class&lt;/STRONG&gt; cat_smoke sanitation handwashing drinkingwatersource caste alcohol_y_n edu_pat edu_mat;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;var&lt;/STRONG&gt; cat_smoke sanitation handwashing drinkingwatersource caste alcohol_y_n edu_pat edu_mat N_Mets1 N_Mets2 N_Mets3 N_Mets4 N_Mets5 N_Mets6 N_Mets7 crprt diet p_activity zns_unic sys1 sys2 sys3 dias1 dias2 dias3;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;output&lt;/STRONG&gt; out=zinc.imputed donorid=donor;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;run;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;data&lt;/STRONG&gt; zinc.imputed;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;set&lt;/STRONG&gt; zinc.imputed;&lt;BR /&gt;if (ImpIndex = 0) then do; /* Include complete respondents */&lt;BR /&gt;do _Imputation_=1 to 5; /* in all imputations. */&lt;BR /&gt;output;&lt;BR /&gt;end;&lt;BR /&gt;end;&lt;BR /&gt;else do; /* Put incomplete respondents */&lt;BR /&gt;_Imputation_ = ImpIndex; /* in separate imputations. */&lt;BR /&gt;output;&lt;BR /&gt;end;&lt;BR /&gt;proc sort data=zinc.imputed;&lt;BR /&gt;by _Imputation_ UnitID;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then I ran the following regression using the default varmethod=TSL:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc surveyreg data=zinc.imputed;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by _imputation;&lt;BR /&gt;cluster psu_no_ov;&lt;BR /&gt;strata newstrata;&lt;BR /&gt;weight imp_wt;&lt;BR /&gt;class cat_zinc;&lt;BR /&gt;model N_Mets8 = cat_zinc / solution noint;&lt;BR /&gt;contrast 'contrasting example' cat_zinc -3 -1 1 3;&lt;BR /&gt;estimate 'overall mean' cat_zinc 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, should I combine the results using PROC miANALYZE? OR Should I remove the by _imputation_ statement from the Proc surveyeg step and report the results without using procmianalyze?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 19:02:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Combining-multiply-imputed-complex-survey-data/m-p/888206#M43995</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saifulinfs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-07T19:02:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

