<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: longitudinal data in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/longitudinal-data/m-p/879739#M43526</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Mkeintz,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it seems to be a good approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Iuri&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 12:19:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>iuri_leite</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-08T12:19:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>longitudinal data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/longitudinal-data/m-p/879174#M43466</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am analyzing a dataset from a cohort of participants in which we observe if they develop specific infection at each quarterly visit. In this dataset a significant number of participants developed the disease more than once. Initially, we used a hazard model considering the time until the first occurrence of the infection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, we are now interested in identifying factors associated with more than one occurrence of the disease. Specifically, in the case of two infections, the individual is identified with an infection at a specific visit, receives treatment and then in another visit, the disease is identified again. Since time is an important element, is it possible to conduct a survival analysis in this case? Is it possible to conduct a survival considering an ordinal response?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Iuri Leite&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2023 20:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/longitudinal-data/m-p/879174#M43466</guid>
      <dc:creator>iuri_leite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-03T20:58:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: longitudinal data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/longitudinal-data/m-p/879196#M43473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why not do the same as you did for the first infection?&amp;nbsp; i.e. do a hazard model to the 2nd infection, by treating records for the first infection as you previously treated records reporting no infection.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 23:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/longitudinal-data/m-p/879196#M43473</guid>
      <dc:creator>mkeintz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-04T23:51:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: longitudinal data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/longitudinal-data/m-p/879739#M43526</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Mkeintz,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it seems to be a good approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Iuri&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 12:19:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/longitudinal-data/m-p/879739#M43526</guid>
      <dc:creator>iuri_leite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T12:19:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

