<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Criteria for comparing statistical methods in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Criteria-for-comparing-statistical-methods/m-p/876884#M43362</link>
    <description>Using "linear mixed effects model&amp;nbsp;",  &lt;BR /&gt;"repeated measures anova" is old and obsolete method.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 11:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-22T11:33:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Criteria for comparing statistical methods</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Criteria-for-comparing-statistical-methods/m-p/876832#M43356</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out the metrics one can use to compare different statistical procedures. For example, when analyzing longitudinal data, several different methods can be used, two of which are linear mixed effects model and repeated measures anova. How would you compare and chose the appropriate method between the two - Is that even possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 01:22:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Criteria-for-comparing-statistical-methods/m-p/876832#M43356</guid>
      <dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-22T01:22:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Criteria for comparing statistical methods</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Criteria-for-comparing-statistical-methods/m-p/876867#M43359</link>
      <description>&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;You can try to start here: &lt;A href="https://support.sas.com/kb/22/630.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.sas.com/kb/22/630.html&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="https://www.lexjansen.com/search/searchresults.php?q=%22model%20assessment%22" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.lexjansen.com/search/searchresults.php?q=%22model%20assessment%22&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 08:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Criteria-for-comparing-statistical-methods/m-p/876867#M43359</guid>
      <dc:creator>JosvanderVelden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-22T08:48:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Criteria for comparing statistical methods</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Criteria-for-comparing-statistical-methods/m-p/876884#M43362</link>
      <description>Using "linear mixed effects model&amp;nbsp;",  &lt;BR /&gt;"repeated measures anova" is old and obsolete method.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 11:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Criteria-for-comparing-statistical-methods/m-p/876884#M43362</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-22T11:33:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

