<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858710#M42446</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you mean ... check the &lt;EM&gt;standardized&lt;/EM&gt; coefficient ... so all coefficients are on the same scale. Otherwise the value of the un-standardized coefficient are all on different scales and not really comparable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:47:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-14T12:47:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858619#M42444</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi folks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is any way to view in logistic regression node results how much each variable included explains? I have continue and categorical variables. If not, there is any way to calculate?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:09:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858619#M42444</guid>
      <dc:creator>MariaD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-13T21:09:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858702#M42445</link>
      <description>You could check the estimated coefficent. The more big of it (absolute value of it),&lt;BR /&gt;The more explain in model.&lt;BR /&gt;Also you could check P value ,the more small ,the more important of this variable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:40:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858702#M42445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T11:40:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858710#M42446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you mean ... check the &lt;EM&gt;standardized&lt;/EM&gt; coefficient ... so all coefficients are on the same scale. Otherwise the value of the un-standardized coefficient are all on different scales and not really comparable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:47:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858710#M42446</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T12:47:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858715#M42447</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10892"&gt;@PaigeMiller&lt;/a&gt;.The only problem it's that the regression node does not show the&amp;nbsp;standardized coefficients for the categorical variables in the result.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm thinking in add a decision tree node, after the regression, with only the variables used on the regression model and with the P_1 as target, selecting the largest tree option. After that, I analyze the variable importance result of the tree decision node. What do you think of this approach?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:23:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858715#M42447</guid>
      <dc:creator>MariaD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T13:23:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858718#M42448</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Decision trees do fundamentally different things than a logistic regression. So, I'm not sure that a decision tree will answer your original question about logistic regression.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as not having standardized coefficients, you can first standardize the data, and then run the logistic regression (this gives you standardized coefficients)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:27:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858718#M42448</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T13:27:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858720#M42449</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10892"&gt;@PaigeMiller&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;. I have the interval variables already standardized, but that does not make much sense for the categorical variables because the are used as 0/1 coding for the regression. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:33:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858720#M42449</guid>
      <dc:creator>MariaD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T13:33:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858723#M42450</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You don't have to code categorical variables as 0 or 1, you could leave them as categories and use a CLASS statement (I'm sure EG has something similar) but however you handle categorical variables, standardizing does not apply.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858723#M42450</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T13:37:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858725#M42451</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10892"&gt;@PaigeMiller&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, you are right. I don't recode the categorical variables, is the way the node treats them. So, in this case, I understand is to analyze the standardized coefficients for the interval variables and the normal coefficients for each category of the categorical variables. That's correct?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858725#M42451</guid>
      <dc:creator>MariaD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T13:40:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858727#M42452</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think that's correct.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:51:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858727#M42452</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T13:51:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EM logistic regression | how much each variable explains</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858780#M42453</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a Variable Selection node that you could look into. Separately from Enterprise Miner, see &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/22605" target="_self"&gt;this note&lt;/A&gt; on variable importance that might be helpful particularly if using the procedures in SAS/STAT.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 17:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/EM-logistic-regression-how-much-each-variable-explains/m-p/858780#M42453</guid>
      <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-14T17:07:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

