<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How are type II boundaries updated with ERRLINE in PROC SEQTEST with BOUNDARYKEY=ALPHA? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-are-type-II-boundaries-updated-with-ERRLINE-in-PROC-SEQTEST/m-p/837179#M41460</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When you say something like " I couldn't get the same values" that means you need to provide data and code you used for calculation. Without knowing what you did we can't say why you get a different result. If you actually did this on paper by hand then that goes double.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your result difference is "small" then I would look to possible rounding in calculations or a boundary value.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your result is extremely different then likely there is a major difference in how you approached the calculations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 14:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-06T14:55:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How are type II boundaries updated with ERRLINE in PROC SEQTEST with BOUNDARYKEY=ALPHA?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-are-type-II-boundaries-updated-with-ERRLINE-in-PROC-SEQTEST/m-p/837139#M41457</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a doubt about proc seqtest procedure. When the actual information level of the first analysis (and subsequent analyses) is higher than the one planned in proc seqdesign and t&lt;SPAN&gt;he options ERRSPENDADJ=ERRLINE and&amp;nbsp;BOUNDARYKEY=ALPHA are specified, type I error is preserved while type II errorr is updated and efficacy and futility boundaries are recalculated based on the boundaries calculated in proc seqdesign and provided in the BOUNDARY statement.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm trying to reproduce (manually) the calculations done by the SAS procedure, I get new type I error boundaries exactly like proc seqtest but I don't understand how to get the new type II error boundaries. I already had a look at the documentation and tried different methodologies including the one related to the ERRLINE described in&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/9.4_3.4/statug/statug_seqtest_details07.htm" target="_blank"&gt;SAS Help Center: Boundary Adjustments for Information Levels&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;but I couldn't get the same values.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there anybody that can help me understanding how these boundaries are updated given the ones from proc seqdesign?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I can also add some codes with a simulated dataset but my issue is related to the mathematical computation rather than an issue with the procedure used with certain data.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 09:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-are-type-II-boundaries-updated-with-ERRLINE-in-PROC-SEQTEST/m-p/837139#M41457</guid>
      <dc:creator>marghe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-06T09:04:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How are type II boundaries updated with ERRLINE in PROC SEQTEST with BOUNDARYKEY=ALPHA?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-are-type-II-boundaries-updated-with-ERRLINE-in-PROC-SEQTEST/m-p/837179#M41460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you say something like " I couldn't get the same values" that means you need to provide data and code you used for calculation. Without knowing what you did we can't say why you get a different result. If you actually did this on paper by hand then that goes double.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your result difference is "small" then I would look to possible rounding in calculations or a boundary value.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your result is extremely different then likely there is a major difference in how you approached the calculations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 14:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-are-type-II-boundaries-updated-with-ERRLINE-in-PROC-SEQTEST/m-p/837179#M41460</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-06T14:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How are type II boundaries updated with ERRLINE in PROC SEQTEST with BOUNDARYKEY=ALPHA?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-are-type-II-boundaries-updated-with-ERRLINE-in-PROC-SEQTEST/m-p/837341#M41470</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply! Unfortunately, it isn't a matter of decimals, it's really about the formula used to compute beta boundaries. I don't know the function used to get beta boundaries from the boundaries calculated in the proc seqdesign.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 08:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/How-are-type-II-boundaries-updated-with-ERRLINE-in-PROC-SEQTEST/m-p/837341#M41470</guid>
      <dc:creator>marghe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-07T08:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

