<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: model building in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84480#M4090</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;At r-square = 0.1, your model has essentially no predictive power. If you give some description of the variables and of the way the observations were acquired (sampling/experimental plan) someone might be able to suggest a better statistical model or at least, alternative data exploration methods and modeling approaches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 01:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-05T01:43:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>model building</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84479#M4089</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a list of variables and built a regression model on them. The R-square is 0.1. Are there any ways to improve the predictive power of the model without finding more variables?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 01:19:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84479#M4089</guid>
      <dc:creator>kurofufu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-05T01:19:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: model building</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84480#M4090</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;At r-square = 0.1, your model has essentially no predictive power. If you give some description of the variables and of the way the observations were acquired (sampling/experimental plan) someone might be able to suggest a better statistical model or at least, alternative data exploration methods and modeling approaches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 01:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84480#M4090</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-05T01:43:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: model building</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84481#M4091</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;"At r-square = 0.1, your model has essentially no predictive power.&lt;/SPAN&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you sure? The CMS-HCC model used by CMS to pay private insurance companies has R-square of 0.09. The model my company is using has R-square of 0.1, but it already helped the company save a lot of money.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Variable transformation is one way which possible help improve the model's predictive power. I would like to know what other options I can have without acquiring more variables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84481#M4091</guid>
      <dc:creator>kurofufu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-05T02:27:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: model building</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84482#M4092</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is true that strength of evidence requirements vary a lot across disciplines.&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; To go beyond regression, you might want to consider the model building techniques provided by data mining tools - PG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/model-building/m-p/84482#M4092</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-05T02:50:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

