<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CONFTYPE = LOGLOG or LINEAR in PROC LIFETEST? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/CONFTYPE-LOGLOG-or-LINEAR-in-PROC-LIFETEST/m-p/799784#M39343</link>
    <description>Linear limits can sometimes go outside the interval (0,1).  The CONFTYPE=loglog generally gives better coverage than linear limits and has been the default for a long time.  It is not related to sample size.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 09:18:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OsoGris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-03T09:18:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CONFTYPE = LOGLOG or LINEAR in PROC LIFETEST?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/CONFTYPE-LOGLOG-or-LINEAR-in-PROC-LIFETEST/m-p/799700#M39339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am using PROC LIFETEST to generate the KM curve and its confidence band. I noticed that there is an option called CONFTYPE= (default is LOGLOG) which can let us choose the type of transformation to calculate the confidence band. I also tried CONFTYPE=LINEAR, and the confidence band is different. To me, the results from LINEAR makes more sense, but I am not sure if I can use it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;My question is, is there any rule to choose the type of transformation? Is it related to the sample size?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 22:02:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/CONFTYPE-LOGLOG-or-LINEAR-in-PROC-LIFETEST/m-p/799700#M39339</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chaupak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-02T22:02:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONFTYPE = LOGLOG or LINEAR in PROC LIFETEST?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/CONFTYPE-LOGLOG-or-LINEAR-in-PROC-LIFETEST/m-p/799784#M39343</link>
      <description>Linear limits can sometimes go outside the interval (0,1).  The CONFTYPE=loglog generally gives better coverage than linear limits and has been the default for a long time.  It is not related to sample size.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 09:18:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/CONFTYPE-LOGLOG-or-LINEAR-in-PROC-LIFETEST/m-p/799784#M39343</guid>
      <dc:creator>OsoGris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-03T09:18:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

