<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Weighted GEE for continuous outcomes in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/796224#M39126</link>
    <description>Dear SteveDenham,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;From SAS Help Centre link above it reads "Prevy: the patient’s amenorrhea&lt;BR /&gt;status in the previous three-month interval. For the baseline visit, this&lt;BR /&gt;is set to an arbitrary nonmissing value (0 here). In this release of PROC&lt;BR /&gt;GEE, this arbitrary value must be nonmissing and valid for the response&lt;BR /&gt;variable—for example, it should be 0 or 1 for a binary response—but it does&lt;BR /&gt;not otherwise affect the results."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As mine is a continuous outcome variable (BMI in kg/square meter), I am&lt;BR /&gt;confused with which arbitrary value should I use. Below is a range of my&lt;BR /&gt;BMI at two-time points. I can see either 0 or 1 is NOT a valid value in my&lt;BR /&gt;case. Can I use any value in the range of BMI as an arbitrary value to&lt;BR /&gt;calculate Prevy? Thank you again and appreciate your unreserved support.&lt;BR /&gt;Variable N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum&lt;BR /&gt;MBMI1&lt;BR /&gt;MBMI2&lt;BR /&gt;2604&lt;BR /&gt;1712&lt;BR /&gt;24.1115344&lt;BR /&gt;27.1624473&lt;BR /&gt;4.9327651&lt;BR /&gt;6.1337117&lt;BR /&gt;14.6923783&lt;BR /&gt;15.6507128&lt;BR /&gt;50.2721204&lt;BR /&gt;67.7393165&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:09:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kunko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-15T08:09:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Weighted GEE for continuous outcomes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/795634#M39055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to examine the effect of the fat intake at 30 years on the BMI change over 9 years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My data had some dropouts which I wanted to account for using Proc GEE with Missmodel statement to calculate weights that are used for reducing biased estimates related to dropouts. I can see we need to create two variables (Prevy and Ctime) to prepare the analysis (&lt;A href="https://go.documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/9.4_3.4/statug/statug_gee_examples03.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;SAS Help Center: Example 47.3 Weighted GEE for Longitudinal Data That Have Missing Values&lt;/A&gt;). But the explanation for creating Prevy is for the binary outcome (Amenorrhea status) in the previous three-month interval given this study was conducted every three months over a year at 4-time points (See the code below). My question is how can I create Prevy for a continuous outcome.&amp;nbsp;Thank you in advance for your support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tolassa&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class=""&gt;data Amenorrhea;
   set Amenorrhea;
   by ID;
   Prevy=lag(Y);
   if first.id then Prevy=0;
   Time=Time-1;
   Ctime=Time;
run;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:57:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/795634#M39055</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kunko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-11T11:57:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weighted GEE for continuous outcomes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/796067#M39115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The code you present should work whether Y is continuous or categorical, I believe.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/796067#M39115</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-14T14:58:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weighted GEE for continuous outcomes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/796224#M39126</link>
      <description>Dear SteveDenham,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;From SAS Help Centre link above it reads "Prevy: the patient’s amenorrhea&lt;BR /&gt;status in the previous three-month interval. For the baseline visit, this&lt;BR /&gt;is set to an arbitrary nonmissing value (0 here). In this release of PROC&lt;BR /&gt;GEE, this arbitrary value must be nonmissing and valid for the response&lt;BR /&gt;variable—for example, it should be 0 or 1 for a binary response—but it does&lt;BR /&gt;not otherwise affect the results."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As mine is a continuous outcome variable (BMI in kg/square meter), I am&lt;BR /&gt;confused with which arbitrary value should I use. Below is a range of my&lt;BR /&gt;BMI at two-time points. I can see either 0 or 1 is NOT a valid value in my&lt;BR /&gt;case. Can I use any value in the range of BMI as an arbitrary value to&lt;BR /&gt;calculate Prevy? Thank you again and appreciate your unreserved support.&lt;BR /&gt;Variable N Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum&lt;BR /&gt;MBMI1&lt;BR /&gt;MBMI2&lt;BR /&gt;2604&lt;BR /&gt;1712&lt;BR /&gt;24.1115344&lt;BR /&gt;27.1624473&lt;BR /&gt;4.9327651&lt;BR /&gt;6.1337117&lt;BR /&gt;14.6923783&lt;BR /&gt;15.6507128&lt;BR /&gt;50.2721204&lt;BR /&gt;67.7393165&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:09:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/796224#M39126</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kunko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-15T08:09:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weighted GEE for continuous outcomes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/796274#M39130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It does not matter what value you use as long as it is a valid value for the distribution of the response.&amp;nbsp; In other words, you could still use 0 as long as 0 is in the support set for the DIST= option even though you won't actually observe a 0 value.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Weighted-GEE-for-continuous-outcomes/m-p/796274#M39130</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-15T14:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

