<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Optimize PROC MCMC software/hardware environment in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792725#M38850</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;BTW, if helpful, single models took 8.5 hours to run.&amp;nbsp; When running three at the same time, the execution time increased to 9.5 hours for each but total start-to-finish time was clearly saved in concert.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 01:32:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Haris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-27T01:32:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Optimize PROC MCMC software/hardware environment</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792635#M38841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Need to run multiple parallel MCMC processes.&amp;nbsp; Models currently take between 8 and 21 hours to complete one-by-one.&amp;nbsp; Looking for any advice in terms of software OPTIONS settings such as THREADS, MEMSIZE, etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also hardware: what should I prioritize -- get more or faster RAM, single thread CPU speed, more cores/threads, more virtual memory, faster I/O as in would upgrading from SATA to M2 interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any help or references much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 19:05:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792635#M38841</guid>
      <dc:creator>Haris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-26T19:05:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimize PROC MCMC software/hardware environment</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792677#M38844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this on a PC or on a remote SAS server? With PCs parallel processing is not really an option if the process itself already chews up most resources.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792677#M38844</guid>
      <dc:creator>SASKiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-26T21:16:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimize PROC MCMC software/hardware environment</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792723#M38849</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply, SASKiwi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The answer is 'in between'.&amp;nbsp; I am working on a Virtual Machine with Local SAS installation.&amp;nbsp; During preliminary testing, I was able to fire off three simultaneous MCMC threads that, initially, took up close to 70% of CPU power but eventually settled at just over 40%.&amp;nbsp; Looks like the CPU can handle double that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RAM behaved very strangely: even though I have 64GB dynamically allocated RAM, SAS grabbed to 8GB on the start of the first process and did not go up from there?&amp;nbsp; Not sure why not.&amp;nbsp; The server can let me get up to&amp;nbsp; 256GB.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't know much about the I/O other than the server runs SSD.&amp;nbsp; This is an interim solution and, if needed, we can build a dedicated machine to handle the analytics.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you work with this?&amp;nbsp; I'd love to hear any input I can get.&amp;nbsp; Any additional questions I can answer to facilitate the exchange?&amp;nbsp; Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 01:24:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792723#M38849</guid>
      <dc:creator>Haris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-27T01:24:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimize PROC MCMC software/hardware environment</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792725#M38850</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BTW, if helpful, single models took 8.5 hours to run.&amp;nbsp; When running three at the same time, the execution time increased to 9.5 hours for each but total start-to-finish time was clearly saved in concert.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 01:32:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Optimize-PROC-MCMC-software-hardware-environment/m-p/792725#M38850</guid>
      <dc:creator>Haris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-27T01:32:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

