<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Understanding changes in LOG OUTPUT in small samples in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Understanding-changes-in-LOG-OUTPUT-in-small-samples/m-p/790230#M38746</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm doing a school project on complications occurring within 30-days post-op, it was defined as a binary variable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The sample is small (n = 139) and we have decided on 5 variables:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Age (continuous)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Comorbidities (binary)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Diagnosis type (3 class category)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Treatment type (3 class category)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Sex (binary)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, I've done collinearity, univariate logistic analyses, and then eventually onto the multivariate logistic. It was stable, everything looked great.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My supervisor suggested looking at 2 additional numeric variables which were also part of our dataset; in clinical terms, it would pose a great question and it has to do with treatment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So I did some exploratory work. I looked into the variables, performed the same steps of looking into scatter plots, univariate, etc etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried the full model with 7 variables and again, stable. The output wasn't far from the initial with 5.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, should I change the code and add&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;units age = 5;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SAS would not output it. I'm sure it has to do with sample size, but could someone help me understand the background of this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deengyn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-14T19:46:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding changes in LOG OUTPUT in small samples</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Understanding-changes-in-LOG-OUTPUT-in-small-samples/m-p/790230#M38746</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm doing a school project on complications occurring within 30-days post-op, it was defined as a binary variable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The sample is small (n = 139) and we have decided on 5 variables:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Age (continuous)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Comorbidities (binary)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Diagnosis type (3 class category)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Treatment type (3 class category)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Sex (binary)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, I've done collinearity, univariate logistic analyses, and then eventually onto the multivariate logistic. It was stable, everything looked great.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My supervisor suggested looking at 2 additional numeric variables which were also part of our dataset; in clinical terms, it would pose a great question and it has to do with treatment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So I did some exploratory work. I looked into the variables, performed the same steps of looking into scatter plots, univariate, etc etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried the full model with 7 variables and again, stable. The output wasn't far from the initial with 5.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, should I change the code and add&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;units age = 5;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SAS would not output it. I'm sure it has to do with sample size, but could someone help me understand the background of this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Understanding-changes-in-LOG-OUTPUT-in-small-samples/m-p/790230#M38746</guid>
      <dc:creator>deengyn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-14T19:46:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Understanding changes in LOG OUTPUT in small samples</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Understanding-changes-in-LOG-OUTPUT-in-small-samples/m-p/790232#M38747</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/326508"&gt;@deengyn&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, should I change the code and add&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;units age = 5;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;SAS would not output it.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; I'm sure it has to do with sample size, but could someone help me understand the background of this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What did the log or error message show? Please post the log/error.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AFAIK UNITS would only affect the calculation of the odds ratio, everything else should remain the same.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/326508"&gt;@deengyn&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm doing a school project on complications occurring within 30-days post-op, it was defined as a binary variable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The sample is small (n = 139) and we have decided on 5 variables:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Age (continuous)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Comorbidities (binary)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Diagnosis type (3 class category)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Treatment type (3 class category)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Sex (binary)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, I've done collinearity, univariate logistic analyses, and then eventually onto the multivariate logistic. It was stable, everything looked great.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My supervisor suggested looking at 2 additional numeric variables which were also part of our dataset; in clinical terms, it would pose a great question and it has to do with treatment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So I did some exploratory work. I looked into the variables, performed the same steps of looking into scatter plots, univariate, etc etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried the full model with 7 variables and again, stable. The output wasn't far from the initial with 5.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, should I change the code and add&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;units age = 5;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SAS would not output it. I'm sure it has to do with sample size, but could someone help me understand the background of this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Understanding-changes-in-LOG-OUTPUT-in-small-samples/m-p/790232#M38747</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-14T19:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

