<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ranking of the residual mean calculated by regression in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Ranking-of-the-residual-mean-calculated-by-regression/m-p/783579#M38479</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes. What you describe is well-known in numerical analysis and often happens. Different chip sets use different caches sizes, which results in round-off-sized differences (1e-16), even in simple operations such as addition.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The two analyses are equally valid, and the numbers are said to be "equal to machine precision."&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 11:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-02T11:02:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ranking of the residual mean calculated by regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Ranking-of-the-residual-mean-calculated-by-regression/m-p/783563#M38478</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I calculated the residual through the following regression analysis(with computer A and B).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc reg data=data;&lt;BR /&gt;model m1=m2 m3 m4 ROA W1-W56 /*countries*/ I1-I66 Y1-Y9/ white VIF;&lt;BR /&gt;output out=d1 R=DA;&lt;BR /&gt;run; quit;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I calculated the average of the calculated residuals for each country (W1-W56, W57), and ordered them by "proc sort" the average. I used the same data-set and sas-code except for computer (A and B).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is that the ranking of the residual mean for each computer is different.&amp;nbsp;The values of the residuals calculated by each computer are the same (visible, 10 decimal places), but differ from each other when the mean is calculated. For example, "2.398665E-17" and "1.878665E-17" etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ttest result of the two residuals (PADA1 and PADA2) calculated by each computer is as follows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Choi_Jay_0-1638434246739.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/66329i6817DFFC1AF74DEC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Choi_Jay_0-1638434246739.png" alt="Choi_Jay_0-1638434246739.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your advice is desperately needed. please.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 08:39:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Ranking-of-the-residual-mean-calculated-by-regression/m-p/783563#M38478</guid>
      <dc:creator>Choi_Jay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-02T08:39:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ranking of the residual mean calculated by regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Ranking-of-the-residual-mean-calculated-by-regression/m-p/783579#M38479</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes. What you describe is well-known in numerical analysis and often happens. Different chip sets use different caches sizes, which results in round-off-sized differences (1e-16), even in simple operations such as addition.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The two analyses are equally valid, and the numbers are said to be "equal to machine precision."&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 11:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Ranking-of-the-residual-mean-calculated-by-regression/m-p/783579#M38479</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-02T11:02:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

