<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc mixed in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778803#M38179</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Forgot to mention that I am dealing with a very small sample size...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DJGS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-05T15:24:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778336#M38147</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello! I am using Proc Mixed. If the null likelihood ratio test is not statistically significant (I tried with 4 different covariance structures), is it nevertheless valid to report the type 3 tests of fixed effects? If it is not valid, what would you suggest I do? My model is pretty simple -- there are three repeated measures per individual, with two fixed effects, and one interaction. Thanks, as always, for your help!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 21:00:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778336#M38147</guid>
      <dc:creator>DJGS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-03T21:00:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778768#M38169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I assume all of the Type 3 tests are non-significant as well.&amp;nbsp; That would lead to the non-significant null likelihood, and then you should report those tests.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:39:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778768#M38169</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-05T13:39:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778802#M38178</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Steve... weirdly, 2 of the fixed effects are non significant, but one is (p=0.0144). Not sure what to do.. I can report it all, but I am not sure how to interpret this. Thanks for any additional thoughts.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:23:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778802#M38178</guid>
      <dc:creator>DJGS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-05T15:23:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778803#M38179</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Forgot to mention that I am dealing with a very small sample size...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mixed/m-p/778803#M38179</guid>
      <dc:creator>DJGS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-05T15:24:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

