<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Assessing Additive interaction for binary response using linear probability in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Assessing-Additive-interaction-for-binary-response-using-linear/m-p/771198#M37745</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out what distribution would be the most appropriate. My professor said to model the log regression as a linear probability to assess for additive scale. I didn't find statically significant interaction when using link=identity distr=bin, but when I stratified by the suspected effect modifier, I could see a difference. When I went back and changed the distr=bin to distr=normal, it displayed significant interaction. She said I could do it, but this doesn't make sense to me because the response variable is binomial. Could someone explain?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:45:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kaeslock223_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-29T18:45:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Additive interaction for binary response using linear probability</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Assessing-Additive-interaction-for-binary-response-using-linear/m-p/771198#M37745</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out what distribution would be the most appropriate. My professor said to model the log regression as a linear probability to assess for additive scale. I didn't find statically significant interaction when using link=identity distr=bin, but when I stratified by the suspected effect modifier, I could see a difference. When I went back and changed the distr=bin to distr=normal, it displayed significant interaction. She said I could do it, but this doesn't make sense to me because the response variable is binomial. Could someone explain?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:45:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Assessing-Additive-interaction-for-binary-response-using-linear/m-p/771198#M37745</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kaeslock223_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-29T18:45:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Assessing Additive interaction for binary response using linear probability</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Assessing-Additive-interaction-for-binary-response-using-linear/m-p/773293#M37797</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please post both versions of the code.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2021 23:07:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Assessing-Additive-interaction-for-binary-response-using-linear/m-p/773293#M37797</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-10T23:07:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

