<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sensitivity analysis in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/735997#M35736</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In my research, I asked the gender of the teenagers from the kids and their parents. In about 99.5% of the cases, the gender reported by kids and parents match. When I look at the association between gender and risky behavior, I want to use one of these gender variables. If I want to use the gender reported by the kids and do a sensitivity analysis that the results would still be almost the same if I was using the gender reported by parents, how would I do that? I am at the bivariate analysis stage. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Emma_at_SAS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-21T14:41:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/735997#M35736</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In my research, I asked the gender of the teenagers from the kids and their parents. In about 99.5% of the cases, the gender reported by kids and parents match. When I look at the association between gender and risky behavior, I want to use one of these gender variables. If I want to use the gender reported by the kids and do a sensitivity analysis that the results would still be almost the same if I was using the gender reported by parents, how would I do that? I am at the bivariate analysis stage. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/735997#M35736</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emma_at_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T14:41:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736020#M35737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you want to find out how the results change if&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;predictor1 (gender_repd_by_kids)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;is replaced by the very highly correlated (almost equal)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;predictor2 (gender_repd_by_parents).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That's not my definition of a sensitivity analysis, but I see what you mean.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would first check to what extent the confidence bounds overlap in analysis 1 versus analysis 2 (for whatever parameter you try to estimate). But others may have better ideas.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Koen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:19:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736020#M35737</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T15:19:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736050#M35741</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, and thank you, Koen! I very much appreciate your insight.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736050#M35741</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emma_at_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T16:09:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736387#M35756</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Try looking at log likelihoods or information criteria for these four models:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Model 1:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;predictor1 (gender_repd_by_kids)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Model 2:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;predictor2 (gender_repd_by_parents).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Model 3: both predictors in the model&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Model 4: Null model (no predictors)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You can either do likelihood ratio tests, or use the AIC to calculate the relative amount of information retained.&amp;nbsp; Comparisons of models 1 and 2 to model 4 tell you something about the effect of each of the predictors, while comparison of model 3 to models 1 and 2 would tell you something about how much additional information is in the added variable (for 3 vs 1, it tells you how much gain there is in predictor 2, and vice versa for 2 vs. 1).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736387#M35756</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T13:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736388#M35757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;SteveDenham! It was very helpful.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does this mean that I need to check them in a regression model, even for bivariate analysis?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:34:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736388#M35757</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emma_at_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T13:34:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736390#M35759</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The approach I suggested does require fitting a model, even for bivariate examination, as I don't see an easy way to get the necessary values for the null model otherwise.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:43:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736390#M35759</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T13:43:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sensitivity analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736399#M35760</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;SteveDenham. I appreciate it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:55:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Sensitivity-analysis/m-p/736399#M35760</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emma_at_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-22T13:55:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

