<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC GLIMMIX for binary data underdispersion in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-for-binary-data-underdispersion/m-p/735126#M35669</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you ever find an answer to this? I'm running a very similar model right now and finding a similarly low chi sq/df indicating under-dispersion (.40).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:53:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NMB82</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-18T19:53:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC GLIMMIX for binary data underdispersion</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-for-binary-data-underdispersion/m-p/619300#M29831</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using PROC GLIMMIX to run a generalized linear mixed model for binary data with logit link function while controlling for observations nested within subjects nested within centers.&amp;nbsp; We would like to be able to assess the model fit as well as the fit statistics for the conditional distribution.&amp;nbsp; When the following code is ran we see that the Pearson Chi-Square / DF is 0.71 suggesting under-dispersion.&amp;nbsp; Many posts I have read say this is the exception rather than the rule and is uncommon - not much is said about what this means for the model or solutions to the problem; any help is greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc glimmix data = dataFinal order = data method=quad empirical ;
  class subjectID centerID  sev(ref="1")
	   region(ref="North America") comorNMDflg(ref="0")
	   dailyDiureticsFLg(ref="0") avgICUadmitCollapse 
            icuRTmanageVentFlg(ref="0");
  model CompFlg(event="1") = sev PEEPConv_IR
					region comorNMDFlg 
		                       dailyDiureticsFLg 
				       rptTimeFrom avgICUadmitCollapse 
                                      icuRTmanageVentFlg
                                / dist=binary link=logit OR solution cl ;
  random intercept / subject = subjectID(centerID) ;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are 4,091 observations from 415 subjects and 70 centers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="fitSnip.JPG" style="width: 426px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/35562iD7BB2928A37D9701/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="fitSnip.JPG" alt="fitSnip.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:08:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-for-binary-data-underdispersion/m-p/619300#M29831</guid>
      <dc:creator>maggieKlein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-22T20:08:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC GLIMMIX for binary data underdispersion</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-for-binary-data-underdispersion/m-p/735126#M35669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you ever find an answer to this? I'm running a very similar model right now and finding a similarly low chi sq/df indicating under-dispersion (.40).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:53:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-for-binary-data-underdispersion/m-p/735126#M35669</guid>
      <dc:creator>NMB82</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-18T19:53:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

