<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: In binary logistic regression, how do you interpret a categorical-by-categorical interaction ter in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/In-binary-logistic-regression-how-do-you-interpret-a-categorical/m-p/732127#M35535</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Rather than look at the parameter estimates table, look at the table labeled either as "Type III Tests" or "Joint Tests". This table gives you a single test for each effect in the model, so there will be a single assessment of the significance of each of your interactions. If an interaction is significant, then that means you need to make comparisons among the levels of one predictor at a fixed level of the interaction predictor. There are several statements that simplify this, but the easiest to use are the LSMEANS or SLICE statements. See &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/24455" target="_self"&gt;this note&lt;/A&gt; which illustrates all of them.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 02:45:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-08T02:45:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>In binary logistic regression, how do you interpret a categorical-by-categorical interaction term?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/In-binary-logistic-regression-how-do-you-interpret-a-categorical/m-p/732124#M35534</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am working with multiply imputed data and I have run a logistic regression model with 6 predictors (3 dichotomous and 3 categorical) and their interaction terms, controlling for a number relevant covariates in SAS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The predictor variables are as follow:&lt;BR /&gt;CVD (0 = No; 1 =Yes)&lt;BR /&gt;HCA (0 = Low; 1= High)&lt;BR /&gt;EDU (1=High School Dropout; 2=Graduated High School; 3=Some College; 4=Graduated College)&lt;BR /&gt;POV (1=Low; 2=Medium; 3=High)&lt;BR /&gt;LAN (1=Spanish; 2=English)&lt;BR /&gt;STA (0=Old, 1=New, 2=None)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My outcome variable is diabetes medication use and is coded as 0 = no use and 1 = current use&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found that for the following:&lt;BR /&gt;1. One of the levels of the interaction of EDU*STA is marginally significant.&lt;BR /&gt;2. Only one of the levels of the interaction of POV*STA is marginally significant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My questions are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. How do you decipher a categorical-by-categorical interaction when only one level of the interaction is marginally significant?&lt;BR /&gt;2. Would it be appropriate to calculate the adjusted odds, as a way to interpret the interaction?&lt;BR /&gt;3. If 95% CI do not include 0 but the CI overlap, does it means that the results are not statistically significant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 02:27:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/In-binary-logistic-regression-how-do-you-interpret-a-categorical/m-p/732124#M35534</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ahinoa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-08T02:27:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: In binary logistic regression, how do you interpret a categorical-by-categorical interaction ter</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/In-binary-logistic-regression-how-do-you-interpret-a-categorical/m-p/732127#M35535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Rather than look at the parameter estimates table, look at the table labeled either as "Type III Tests" or "Joint Tests". This table gives you a single test for each effect in the model, so there will be a single assessment of the significance of each of your interactions. If an interaction is significant, then that means you need to make comparisons among the levels of one predictor at a fixed level of the interaction predictor. There are several statements that simplify this, but the easiest to use are the LSMEANS or SLICE statements. See &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/24455" target="_self"&gt;this note&lt;/A&gt; which illustrates all of them.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 02:45:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/In-binary-logistic-regression-how-do-you-interpret-a-categorical/m-p/732127#M35535</guid>
      <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-08T02:45:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: In binary logistic regression, how do you interpret a categorical-by-categorical interaction ter</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/In-binary-logistic-regression-how-do-you-interpret-a-categorical/m-p/734612#M35644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the quick reply!!!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do understand the rationale for using the SLICE statement, but since I am fitting a multivariable logistic model using &lt;STRONG&gt;multiple imputed data (10 datasets)&lt;/STRONG&gt; the issue I am running into is that I cannot figure out a way to use PROC MIANALYZE to pool the estimates. Is there a way to work around this issue?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/In-binary-logistic-regression-how-do-you-interpret-a-categorical/m-p/734612#M35644</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ahinoa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-15T23:31:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

