<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: proc PHREG takes too long to assess proportional hazards assumption in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723855#M35085</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In particular, how long to fit the full model?&amp;nbsp; I suspect that you may have to make some subject matter decisions regarding the independent variables to get this down to a workable size.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 13:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-05T13:14:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>proc PHREG takes too long to assess proportional hazards assumption</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723336#M35077</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Encountering very long processing times when trying to assess the proportional hazards assumption in a Cox regression model.&amp;nbsp; I am having to terminate the process due to long wait times.&amp;nbsp; The problem persists regardless of whether I am using SAS Base 9.4 (on Windows desktop) or SAS&amp;nbsp;Studio (Mac).&amp;nbsp; Below is the code, where &amp;amp;cat is a list of categorical variables (n=23), and &amp;amp;cont is a list of continuous variables (n=3).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;proc phreg data=work.outcomes_fnl3_wocong;

class
demo_age1 (REF='&amp;lt;50') demo_gender (REF='M') primdx (REF='Ischemic')
preop_cr1 (REF='&amp;lt;0.9') preop_bili1 (REF='&amp;lt;1.2')
comorb_dm (REF="0") comorb_dial (REF="0") comorb_copd (REF="0") comorb_htn (REF="0") comorb_cvd (REF="0")
preop_abo (REF='A') preop_pra_sens (REF="&amp;lt;20") 
preop_ino (REF="0") preop_ecmo (REF="0") preop_iabp (REF="0") preop_vent (REF="0") 
cvs_prev_typ (REF="VALVE")
donor_age1 (REF='&amp;lt;50') donor_gender (REF='M') donor_cod (REF='Head Trauma')
induct (REF='0')
postop_plasma (REF='0')
op_era (REF="2004-2010")
 / param=ref;

model mort_y*mort(0)=&amp;amp;cat &amp;amp;cont / rl SELECTION = STEPWISE SLS = .05 SLE = .05;

assess var=(&amp;amp;cont)ph / resample;

run;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 19:54:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723336#M35077</guid>
      <dc:creator>akhmerova</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-04T19:54:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Long lag time to assess proportional hazards assumption</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723589#M35078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Re-titled, and moved to &lt;EM&gt;procedures&lt;/EM&gt; community.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 19:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723589#M35078</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisNZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-04T19:52:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proc PHREG takes too long to assess proportional hazards assumption</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723596#M35079</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How long does it take to run if you just fit one model instead of using stepwise selection?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 20:01:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723596#M35079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-04T20:01:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proc PHREG takes too long to assess proportional hazards assumption</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723855#M35085</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In particular, how long to fit the full model?&amp;nbsp; I suspect that you may have to make some subject matter decisions regarding the independent variables to get this down to a workable size.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 13:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-PHREG-takes-too-long-to-assess-proportional-hazards/m-p/723855#M35085</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-05T13:14:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

