<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Zero-One Inflated Regression - Bias? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Zero-One-Inflated-Regression-Bias/m-p/721575#M34958</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;We have recently been trying to use the zero-one inflated beta regression macros that you was published in conjunction with SAS Global Forum 2012; they have been very helpful in more accurately modelling the Loss Given Default (LGD) data that we encounter!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I am puzzled by something we have observed, and was hoping someone might have some suggestions as to how to proceed.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;In our dataset, the probability of the zero and one outcomes are ~55% and ~22% respectively.&amp;nbsp; After modelling, the average predicted probabilities are ~71% and ~48% respectively.&amp;nbsp; I am surprised that: (i) the predicted probabilities appear to be biased (i.e., they are not replicating the observed probabilities in the dataset); and (ii) that they sum to &amp;gt;100%, which is obviously impossible.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;We want to use the model to make forecasts, but given the 'raw' predictions this would obviously&amp;nbsp;result in overestimation.&amp;nbsp; I am thinking of making some simple adjustments (i.e., applying ratios of 55%/71% and 22%/48% to model predictions), but I am wondering whether someone might have some other suggestions that we should consider.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jesse_C</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-24T14:20:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Zero-One Inflated Regression - Bias?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Zero-One-Inflated-Regression-Bias/m-p/721575#M34958</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;We have recently been trying to use the zero-one inflated beta regression macros that you was published in conjunction with SAS Global Forum 2012; they have been very helpful in more accurately modelling the Loss Given Default (LGD) data that we encounter!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I am puzzled by something we have observed, and was hoping someone might have some suggestions as to how to proceed.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;In our dataset, the probability of the zero and one outcomes are ~55% and ~22% respectively.&amp;nbsp; After modelling, the average predicted probabilities are ~71% and ~48% respectively.&amp;nbsp; I am surprised that: (i) the predicted probabilities appear to be biased (i.e., they are not replicating the observed probabilities in the dataset); and (ii) that they sum to &amp;gt;100%, which is obviously impossible.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;We want to use the model to make forecasts, but given the 'raw' predictions this would obviously&amp;nbsp;result in overestimation.&amp;nbsp; I am thinking of making some simple adjustments (i.e., applying ratios of 55%/71% and 22%/48% to model predictions), but I am wondering whether someone might have some other suggestions that we should consider.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Zero-One-Inflated-Regression-Bias/m-p/721575#M34958</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jesse_C</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-24T14:20:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

