<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Chi-square tests for multi-way tables using complex surve data? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719116#M34792</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I know how to use proc surveyfreq and specify the chi-sqare (chisq) option for looking at associations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I usually use the Rao-Scott chi-square output, even for multi-way tables. I've never been taught/told not to, but is this actually correct? Is there some other way to specifically look at tables bigger than 2-way tables?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 15:40:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SAS93</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-13T15:40:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Chi-square tests for multi-way tables using complex surve data?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719116#M34792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know how to use proc surveyfreq and specify the chi-sqare (chisq) option for looking at associations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I usually use the Rao-Scott chi-square output, even for multi-way tables. I've never been taught/told not to, but is this actually correct? Is there some other way to specifically look at tables bigger than 2-way tables?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 15:40:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719116#M34792</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS93</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-13T15:40:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chi-square tests for multi-way tables using complex surve data?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719153#M34793</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If one variable is a response variable and the others are predictors of that response, then this is usually done by logistic regression. So, you could use PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 21:48:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719153#M34793</guid>
      <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-13T21:48:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chi-square tests for multi-way tables using complex surve data?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719368#M34798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;SURVEYFREQ does not have a test that is analogous to the CMH test in Proc FREQ.&amp;nbsp; I have not seen much discussion of this in the survey sampling literature.&amp;nbsp; Essentially it will treat each level of the third (or fourth, etc.) variable as a separate domain and perform a Chi-Square test on each unique two-way table&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:06:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719368#M34798</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-15T16:06:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chi-square tests for multi-way tables using complex surve data?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719626#M34814</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This in turn makes&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13633"&gt;@StatDave&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;'s suggestion regarding SURVEYLOGISTIC about the only alternative.&amp;nbsp; Including an interaction term should provide an approximation to a CMH analysis.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:04:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Chi-square-tests-for-multi-way-tables-using-complex-surve-data/m-p/719626#M34814</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-16T13:04:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

