<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc mi with no intercept in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mi-with-no-intercept/m-p/715003#M34579</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Proc MI does not have anything analogous to the NOINT option.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general the imputation model and the analyst model should be the same, but in practice that is not always the case.&amp;nbsp; Schafer(1997) has shown a lot of work on this, but in general he found that if the analyst's model is reduced from the imputer's model (like in the case of Intercept and no-intercept models) then the imputer's model is still valid provided that the analyst's assumption is correct.&amp;nbsp; The MI documentation has a full discussion of this&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://go.documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmsascdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4_3.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_mi_details56.htm&amp;amp;locale=en"&gt;https://go.documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmsascdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4_3.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_mi_details56.htm&amp;amp;locale=en&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:54:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-01-28T14:54:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc mi with no intercept</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mi-with-no-intercept/m-p/714981#M34576</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV id="bodyDisplay_150ded3f16629d" class="lia-message-body lia-component-message-view-widget-body lia-component-body-signature-highlight-escalation lia-component-message-view-widget-body-signature-highlight-escalation"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I run imputation models for many subgroups of a population. Before I run my proc mi procedure I do a model selection for each subgroup. For some subgroups the optimal model would not contain an intercept.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I could not find any way of running proc mi with no intercept. The equivalent in proc reg or proc glm would be&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc reg data=have;&lt;BR /&gt;model dependent = &amp;amp;macrolistofindependent./ noint selection=adjrsq sse aic ; &lt;BR /&gt;run; quit;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does someone know how to run proc mi with no intercept?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any pointers!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Gerit&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:35:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mi-with-no-intercept/m-p/714981#M34576</guid>
      <dc:creator>MsGeritO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-28T13:35:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc mi with no intercept</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mi-with-no-intercept/m-p/715003#M34579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Proc MI does not have anything analogous to the NOINT option.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general the imputation model and the analyst model should be the same, but in practice that is not always the case.&amp;nbsp; Schafer(1997) has shown a lot of work on this, but in general he found that if the analyst's model is reduced from the imputer's model (like in the case of Intercept and no-intercept models) then the imputer's model is still valid provided that the analyst's assumption is correct.&amp;nbsp; The MI documentation has a full discussion of this&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://go.documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmsascdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4_3.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_mi_details56.htm&amp;amp;locale=en"&gt;https://go.documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmsascdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4_3.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_mi_details56.htm&amp;amp;locale=en&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:54:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mi-with-no-intercept/m-p/715003#M34579</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-28T14:54:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc mi with no intercept</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mi-with-no-intercept/m-p/715208#M34591</link>
      <description>Thank you, Rob, for the weblink. It was helpful indeed!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:57:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-mi-with-no-intercept/m-p/715208#M34591</guid>
      <dc:creator>MsGeritO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-29T08:57:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

