<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fixed effect and IV together for binary dependent variable in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Fixed-effect-and-IV-together-for-binary-dependent-variable/m-p/70443#M3419</link>
    <description>I don't think this is straightforward. Angrist and Krueger in their survey paper argue that 2SLS is still a robust means of estimating an average treatment effect when&lt;BR /&gt;
the dependent or IV variable is binary. However, they don't discuss fixed effects models.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Angrist, Joshua D. and Alan B. Krueger (2001), 'Instrumental&lt;BR /&gt;
variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to&lt;BR /&gt;
natural experiments' Journal of Economic Perspectives 15:69-85.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BruceBrad</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-02T01:44:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fixed effect and IV together for binary dependent variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Fixed-effect-and-IV-together-for-binary-dependent-variable/m-p/70442#M3418</link>
      <description>I have binary dependent variable and one of my independent variable is endogenous. I also want to control for group level heterogeneity using fixed effect. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
How can I use instrument variable approach to control for endogeneity  and fixed effect to control for group level heterogeneity together in a single model. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is it possible to do this using SAS.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
 I will also really appreciate if I somebody can provide me some references  on this topic</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 05:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Fixed-effect-and-IV-together-for-binary-dependent-variable/m-p/70442#M3418</guid>
      <dc:creator>hsingh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-09T05:52:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fixed effect and IV together for binary dependent variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Fixed-effect-and-IV-together-for-binary-dependent-variable/m-p/70443#M3419</link>
      <description>I don't think this is straightforward. Angrist and Krueger in their survey paper argue that 2SLS is still a robust means of estimating an average treatment effect when&lt;BR /&gt;
the dependent or IV variable is binary. However, they don't discuss fixed effects models.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Angrist, Joshua D. and Alan B. Krueger (2001), 'Instrumental&lt;BR /&gt;
variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to&lt;BR /&gt;
natural experiments' Journal of Economic Perspectives 15:69-85.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Fixed-effect-and-IV-together-for-binary-dependent-variable/m-p/70443#M3419</guid>
      <dc:creator>BruceBrad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-02T01:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

