<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Phreg and multiple groups and violated PH ratio in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/705194#M34160</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you both very much for your help! I really appreciate it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>toyodn01</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-10T19:42:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Phreg and multiple groups and violated PH ratio</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/704223#M34157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I have a question about proc phreg with multiple groups and violated PH ratio.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to compare the re-intervention on patients who had a procedure. There are three procedures (Group=0,1,2) and the outcome is reintervention (0 ,1).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Comparison of interest is 1) Group 1 vs 0 and 2) Group 1 vs 2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Proportional hazard ratio is violated, so I would like to include interaction term to evaluate hazard ratio at each time point (5, 10, 15 years after procedure).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created two dichotomous variables to express Group. Group 0: A=0, B=0, Group 1: A=1, B=0, Group 2: A=0, B=1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think contrast statement should be used, but I am not quite sure what interaction term is included.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc phreg data=X;&lt;BR /&gt;model Time_to_reintervention*reintervention(0)=A B interaction/rl ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interaction=??;&lt;BR /&gt;contrast 'time=5' A ? B ? interaction ? /&lt;BR /&gt;estimate=exp e;&lt;BR /&gt;contrast 'time=10' A ? B ? interaction ? /&lt;BR /&gt;estimate=exp e;&lt;BR /&gt;contrast 'time=15' A ? B ? interaction ? /&lt;BR /&gt;estimate=exp e;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would greatly appreciate if if you could help...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 17:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/704223#M34157</guid>
      <dc:creator>toyodn01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-07T17:55:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Phreg and multiple groups and violated PH ratio</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/704395#M34158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am going to pull a Ksharp trick here and ask someone else who knows quite a bit about PHREG.&amp;nbsp; So calling&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/32733"&gt;@FreelanceReinh&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 13:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/704395#M34158</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-08T13:20:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Phreg and multiple groups and violated PH ratio</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/704422#M34159</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, Steve. Sadly, I have never dealt with the case of non-proportional hazards. By a quick web search I found two conference papers on this particular subject:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.lexjansen.com/phuse/2013/sp/SP07.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Extensions of Cox Model for Non-Proportional Hazards Purpose&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.sas.com/content/dam/SAS/support/en/sas-global-forum-proceedings/2018/2445-2018.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;The Cox Hazard Model for Claims Data&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[1] suggests an "interaction of particular covariate with a function of time variable" (which might be what the OP is trying to implement) or, alternatively, a "stratification model."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[2] uses a Bayesian approach.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:25:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/704422#M34159</guid>
      <dc:creator>FreelanceReinh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-08T15:25:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Phreg and multiple groups and violated PH ratio</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/705194#M34160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you both very much for your help! I really appreciate it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Phreg-and-multiple-groups-and-violated-PH-ratio/m-p/705194#M34160</guid>
      <dc:creator>toyodn01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-10T19:42:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

