<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Automatic Backwards elimination in Proc Mixed in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70067#M3399</link>
    <description>I'm going to stick with glmselect, the script posted by Prof Fernandez is not very easy to use.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yiferic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-31T19:24:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Automatic Backwards elimination in Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70064#M3396</link>
      <description>I think there's supposed to be a way to have sas automatically do backwards elimination in proc reg, but is there a way to do it in proc mixed? Our main issue is we have a lot of variables and we are not sure whether the cross terms are significant or not.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 16:58:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70064#M3396</guid>
      <dc:creator>yiferic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-26T16:58:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Automatic Backwards elimination in Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70065#M3397</link>
      <description>There is no direct way to do this with MIXED. This is a nontrivial matter, and there are lots of things to consider. There is a nice procedure called GLMSELECT for linear model selection, but only for fixed effects. A fascinating macro has been written to do what you are asking. See:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/forum2007/191-2007.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/forum2007/191-2007.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
for a description. I have not used it, and it looks like it takes a lot of effort to set up and get to run (initially). But the output, including graphics, look great.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 01:55:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70065#M3397</guid>
      <dc:creator>lvm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-27T01:55:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Automatic Backwards elimination in Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70066#M3398</link>
      <description>Thanks, will try it out and update.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 19:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70066#M3398</guid>
      <dc:creator>yiferic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-27T19:39:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Automatic Backwards elimination in Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70067#M3399</link>
      <description>I'm going to stick with glmselect, the script posted by Prof Fernandez is not very easy to use.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Automatic-Backwards-elimination-in-Proc-Mixed/m-p/70067#M3399</guid>
      <dc:creator>yiferic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-31T19:24:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

