<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SEs for fixed effects affected by solution in random statement in proc mixed in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/691262#M33337</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good question.&amp;nbsp; I have a hunch you will need to take this up with Tech Support.&amp;nbsp; When you get an answer, please post it here.&amp;nbsp; This is the kind of unexpected behavior that some of us need to consider.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 13:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-13T13:58:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SEs for fixed effects affected by solution in random statement in proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/691067#M33315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The inclusion of solution option in random statement in proc mixed affects the SEs of the fixed effects, which is very surprising to me. Can anyone provide insight?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;General code:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc mixed data=data;
class sub;
model AVAL = BL TIME TIMEK /solution cl ddfm=KR;
random int time timek / subject=sub type=un;

run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depending on whether solution option is included in random statement, fixed effects results (SEs) are different. Effect is small, but I don't see how explicit estimation of subject specific random effects (EBLUP) would change the estimation of fixed effect variance. In the parameterization in SAS help, this would appear to affect the estimate of V.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ehmst3_1-1602530235766.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/50574iAC747FB883C0E079/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ehmst3_1-1602530235766.png" alt="ehmst3_1-1602530235766.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/691067#M33315</guid>
      <dc:creator>ehmst3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-12T19:39:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEs for fixed effects affected by solution in random statement in proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/691262#M33337</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good question.&amp;nbsp; I have a hunch you will need to take this up with Tech Support.&amp;nbsp; When you get an answer, please post it here.&amp;nbsp; This is the kind of unexpected behavior that some of us need to consider.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 13:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/691262#M33337</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-13T13:58:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEs for fixed effects affected by solution in random statement in proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/691327#M33338</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the suggestion. I have reached out to Tech Support and I will post the response.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:13:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/691327#M33338</guid>
      <dc:creator>ehmst3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-13T16:13:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SEs for fixed effects affected by solution in random statement in proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/846663#M41921</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there, did you ever receive an answer from Tech Support? I had the same question, and don't want to post again if you already found the solution. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/SEs-for-fixed-effects-affected-by-solution-in-random-statement/m-p/846663#M41921</guid>
      <dc:creator>lsandell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-28T18:24:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

