<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: proc hpsplit: Rolling window training and validation instead of k-fold validation in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-hpsplit-Rolling-window-training-and-validation-instead-of-k/m-p/653448#M31427</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Re-titled and moved to procedures thread.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChrisNZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-04T22:36:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>proc hpsplit: Rolling window training and validation instead of k-fold validation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-hpsplit-Rolling-window-training-and-validation-instead-of-k/m-p/653049#M31426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am building a decision tree model using proc hpsplit. As I am dealing with time-series data, I want to do a walk-forward validation as suggested instead of 10-fold cross-validation or random sampling as validation set. Validation of the trained decision tree model is done in sliding window:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Starting at the beginning of the time series, 10-year window is used to train a model.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;The model makes a prediction for the next year.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;The prediction is stored or evaluated against known value&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Next sliding 10-year window to include the known value and the process is repeated (back to step 1.)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How can we do this in SAS?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-hpsplit-Rolling-window-training-and-validation-instead-of-k/m-p/653049#M31426</guid>
      <dc:creator>Baolinhdo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T22:33:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proc hpsplit: Rolling window training and validation instead of k-fold validation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-hpsplit-Rolling-window-training-and-validation-instead-of-k/m-p/653448#M31427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Re-titled and moved to procedures thread.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 22:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-hpsplit-Rolling-window-training-and-validation-instead-of-k/m-p/653448#M31427</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisNZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-04T22:36:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proc hpsplit: Rolling window training and validation instead of k-fold validation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-hpsplit-Rolling-window-training-and-validation-instead-of-k/m-p/663798#M31636</link>
      <description>Thanks, I will</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2020 06:32:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-hpsplit-Rolling-window-training-and-validation-instead-of-k/m-p/663798#M31636</guid>
      <dc:creator>Baolinhdo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-21T06:32:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

