<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Adjustment for multiple comparisons with LSMeans in multinomial generalized logit model in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjustment-for-multiple-comparisons-with-LSMeans-in-multinomial/m-p/652346#M31328</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You can combine as many test p-values for correction as you want with &lt;A href="https://documentation.sas.com/?docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetVersion=14.3&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_multtest_overview.htm&amp;amp;locale=en" target="_self"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;proc multtest&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;. Just output the p-values to a dataset using ODS OUTPUT and refer to that dataset with the INPVALUES= option of proc multtest.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 19:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-01T19:25:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Adjustment for multiple comparisons with LSMeans in multinomial generalized logit model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjustment-for-multiple-comparisons-with-LSMeans-in-multinomial/m-p/652331#M31327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm using PROC GEE to analyze a multinomial generalized logit model (4-category outcome = 3 logit models).&amp;nbsp; I am running LSMeans to get all pairwise differences with an adjustment for multiple comparisons.&amp;nbsp; I notice that the adjustments are made viewing the 3 logit models separately rather than jointly as a system; thus the adjustment is lot smaller than I expected.&amp;nbsp; For example, if I have 6 pairwise comparisons per logit model and 3 logit models, I have a total of 18 pairwise comparisons.&amp;nbsp; I figured the adjustment would be for 18 comparisons, but the adjustment only seems to be for 6 comparisons.&amp;nbsp; For example, if using Bonferroni*, adjusted p-value = p-value * 6, rather than p-value * 18.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this ok to do?&amp;nbsp; Can the 3 logit models really be viewed independently so I don't have to adjust for comparisons made in the other models?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This difference can be seen using LSMEstimate and coding all pairwise comparisons.&amp;nbsp; If I use category = joint, I get the expected adjustment for 18 comparisons, but if I use category = separate, then I get the same results as LSMeans, adjusted for only 6 comparisons.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(* Note, I am not actually using Bonferroni, but it was the easiest to use as an example.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Warm regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc gee data = cogFunc._07_Model descending;
    class ID outcomeClassN exposureC (ref = '1 = Low');

    model outcomeClassN = exposureC / dist = multinomial link = gLogit type3 wald;
    repeated subject = ID;

    lsMeans exposureC / diff adjust = bon;
    lsmEstimate exposureC 'Very high vs. Low'           0  0  1 -1,
                          'High vs. Low'                0  1  0 -1,
                          'Intermediate vs. Low'        1  0  0 -1,
                          'Very high vs. Intermediate' -1  0  1  0,
                          'High vs. Intermediate'      -1  1  0  0,
                          'Very high vs. High'          0 -1  1  0
        / category = joint adjust = bon;
run;
&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 18:55:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjustment-for-multiple-comparisons-with-LSMeans-in-multinomial/m-p/652331#M31327</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kastchei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-01T18:55:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adjustment for multiple comparisons with LSMeans in multinomial generalized logit model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjustment-for-multiple-comparisons-with-LSMeans-in-multinomial/m-p/652346#M31328</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can combine as many test p-values for correction as you want with &lt;A href="https://documentation.sas.com/?docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetVersion=14.3&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_multtest_overview.htm&amp;amp;locale=en" target="_self"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;proc multtest&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;. Just output the p-values to a dataset using ODS OUTPUT and refer to that dataset with the INPVALUES= option of proc multtest.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2020 19:25:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjustment-for-multiple-comparisons-with-LSMeans-in-multinomial/m-p/652346#M31328</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-01T19:25:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

