https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Better-way-to-present-3-way-interactions/m-p/64491#M3067 Hi,<BR /> <BR /> My question is bit off from SAS and STAT tracks. But, hopefully you guys might have also come across this kind of puzzle. <BR /> <BR /> I am handling few 3-way interactions and have applied Tukey’ s student range test and Tukey-Kramer’s test to significant differences among means. Y variables are log transformed. I want to take opinion what should be the best possible way to present these interactions. I am thinking to have it in tables instead of graphs. But adding three different schemes of letters/numbers/symbols to differentiate means are making tables congested. In my field people, mostly put LSD. But I want to stick to Tukey’ s tests. <BR /> <BR /> Can we calculate something like LSD based on Tukey’ s test to get rid of different schemes of letters/numbers/symbols in the table? Are there any good reference showing 3-way interactions in neat form?<BR /> <BR /> Thanks<BR /> Bhupinder Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:50:29 GMT Bhupinder 2011-01-20T00:50:29Z https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Better-way-to-present-3-way-interactions/m-p/64491#M3067 Hi,<BR /> <BR /> My question is bit off from SAS and STAT tracks. But, hopefully you guys might have also come across this kind of puzzle. <BR /> <BR /> I am handling few 3-way interactions and have applied Tukey’ s student range test and Tukey-Kramer’s test to significant differences among means. Y variables are log transformed. I want to take opinion what should be the best possible way to present these interactions. I am thinking to have it in tables instead of graphs. But adding three different schemes of letters/numbers/symbols to differentiate means are making tables congested. In my field people, mostly put LSD. But I want to stick to Tukey’ s tests. <BR /> <BR /> Can we calculate something like LSD based on Tukey’ s test to get rid of different schemes of letters/numbers/symbols in the table? Are there any good reference showing 3-way interactions in neat form?<BR /> <BR /> Thanks<BR /> Bhupinder Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:50:29 GMT https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Better-way-to-present-3-way-interactions/m-p/64491#M3067 Bhupinder 2011-01-20T00:50:29Z https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Better-way-to-present-3-way-interactions/m-p/64492#M3068 Although I am generally not a fan of PROC G3D, it has a SCATTER statement which can be used along with the SHAPE option to show the groups in the interaction. Code the various shapes to the significantly different groups in the interaction - this can work well when the groups are fairly distinct. Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:35:40 GMT https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Better-way-to-present-3-way-interactions/m-p/64492#M3068 ArtC 2011-01-20T02:35:40Z