<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Countreg nonsense (?) in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Countreg-nonsense/m-p/63681#M3013</link>
    <description>Thank you very much, StatDave.  That's just what the doctor ordered.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GVeers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-12T21:00:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Countreg nonsense (?)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Countreg-nonsense/m-p/63679#M3011</link>
      <description>I'm using Proc Countreg to fit a zero inflated poisson distribution.  However, I'm either misinterpreting the Inflated statistics or they don't make sense:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Inf_Intercept estimate =  0.525351&lt;BR /&gt;
Inf_Variable estimate =  -0.783426&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So now, looking at an individual observation with "Variable" = 0, I'd like to know the odds of that observation producing a zero (without considering the poisson distribution).  My understanding is that this probability is&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
exp(0.525351) * exp(-0.783426) ^ 0&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
or just exp(0.525351) = 1.69&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Obviously 1.69 is not a legitimate probability.  What am I missing?  By the way, it is fully possible for "Variable" to equal zero in this dataset.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Countreg-nonsense/m-p/63679#M3011</guid>
      <dc:creator>GVeers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T15:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Countreg nonsense (?)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Countreg-nonsense/m-p/63680#M3012</link>
      <description>The probability of a zero is not a function of only the zero-inflation parameters.  There are two processes at play that each contribute to the probability.  The probabilities of various counts (including zero) can be computed by the PROBCOUNTS macro available in this sample program:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
   &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/26161" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/kb/26161&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The Details section of the macro's description discusses further what I'm talking about.  See the Long (1997) reference for even more detail.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:41:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Countreg-nonsense/m-p/63680#M3012</guid>
      <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T18:41:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Countreg nonsense (?)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Countreg-nonsense/m-p/63681#M3013</link>
      <description>Thank you very much, StatDave.  That's just what the doctor ordered.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:00:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Countreg-nonsense/m-p/63681#M3013</guid>
      <dc:creator>GVeers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T21:00:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

