<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Identify the best predictor of a count outcome in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Identify-the-best-predictor-of-a-count-outcome/m-p/620215#M29867</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Another possibility is to use the &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/60162" target="_self"&gt;RsquareV macro&lt;/A&gt; to either get an R-square measure for the separate models or to assess the relative variable importance for each predictor in a multi-predictor model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:24:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-27T16:24:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Identify the best predictor of a count outcome</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Identify-the-best-predictor-of-a-count-outcome/m-p/619953#M29848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am running a negative binomial regression on various predictors of a count outcome and want to be able to make a conclusion on which one is the "best" at predicting the counts. Are there any metrics that can be compared between models to make this conclusion? I was thinking psuedo r-squared, but understand that that can't be interpreted the same as a regular r-square. Any tips?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 23:58:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Identify-the-best-predictor-of-a-count-outcome/m-p/619953#M29848</guid>
      <dc:creator>Melk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-24T23:58:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identify the best predictor of a count outcome</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Identify-the-best-predictor-of-a-count-outcome/m-p/619976#M29850</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I needed a single goodness of fit measure, I would choose AICc. It is valid and robust as long as you are comparing models fit to the same set of dependent observations (in your case, the same set of counts), irrespective of the structure of the model. The lowest value is the best.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That said, never accept a model on the basis of a single measure. Always cheks the fit graphically. SAS provides many standard graphs (e.g. residuals vs predicted) to do so.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 04:44:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Identify-the-best-predictor-of-a-count-outcome/m-p/619976#M29850</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-25T04:44:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Identify the best predictor of a count outcome</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Identify-the-best-predictor-of-a-count-outcome/m-p/620215#M29867</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Another possibility is to use the &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/60162" target="_self"&gt;RsquareV macro&lt;/A&gt; to either get an R-square measure for the separate models or to assess the relative variable importance for each predictor in a multi-predictor model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:24:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Identify-the-best-predictor-of-a-count-outcome/m-p/620215#M29867</guid>
      <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-27T16:24:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

