<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC QUANTREG question about estimated values, intercept and actual quantile in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-QUANTREG-question-about-estimated-values-intercept-and/m-p/614882#M29676</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the confusion comes from the fact that MomWtGain is roughly centered around zero (it has median=0). Thus the intercept roughly coincides with the mean of MonWtGain.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 23:40:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-02T23:40:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC QUANTREG question about estimated values, intercept and actual quantile</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-QUANTREG-question-about-estimated-values-intercept-and/m-p/614848#M29675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi and HNY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using SAS 9.4 TS 1M5 on Windows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I run&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;title;
proc quantreg ci=sparsity/iid algorithm=interior(tolerance=5.e-4)  data=sashelp.bweight order=internal plots = none;
   model Weight = MomWtGain/quantile = (0.25, .5, .75);
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;then I get some slightly puzzling results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For each quantile (25, 50, 75) we have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a. The actual quantiles which are 3062.0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3402.0&amp;nbsp; and 3720.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b,&amp;nbsp; The predicted values at mean, which are 3068.02, 3394.93 and 3719.04&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c. The intercepts which are&amp;nbsp; 3062.0, 3389.46 and 3714.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sometimes they are exactly the same, sometimes slightly different.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why is that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 20:35:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-QUANTREG-question-about-estimated-values-intercept-and/m-p/614848#M29675</guid>
      <dc:creator>plf515</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-02T20:35:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC QUANTREG question about estimated values, intercept and actual quantile</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-QUANTREG-question-about-estimated-values-intercept-and/m-p/614882#M29676</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the confusion comes from the fact that MomWtGain is roughly centered around zero (it has median=0). Thus the intercept roughly coincides with the mean of MonWtGain.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 23:40:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-QUANTREG-question-about-estimated-values-intercept-and/m-p/614882#M29676</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-02T23:40:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

