<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Shortest (random) path through randomized design in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Shortest-random-path-through-randomized-design/m-p/588216#M28795</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;JMP has a separate community. You can post JMP questions to&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-12T13:35:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Shortest (random) path through randomized design</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Shortest-random-path-through-randomized-design/m-p/588130#M28791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Due to time constraints and experimental possibilities I am interested in instead of a completely randomized DOE in JMP, a 'shortest path' through my experimental space:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) minimize the number of cases&amp;nbsp; where more than one parameter changes between two consecutive experiments&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) minimize multiple-step changes between levels within the parameters (i.e. prefer '-1 to 0' and '0 to +1' over '-1 to +1').&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) adding an extra experiment would cost less time than allowing either 1 or 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has someone tried this / studied the effect of this on an experimental design and the statistical effects?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(maybe to visualize: considering visiting 10 cities by car to take a sample in each city in a 20-experiment DOE, minimizing the amount of petrol you want to use - not as the goal of the experiment, but as the design of the experiment).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I am currently on JMP 13, but can get access to JMP 14 and 15).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 07:39:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Shortest-random-path-through-randomized-design/m-p/588130#M28791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Beetstra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T07:39:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Shortest (random) path through randomized design</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Shortest-random-path-through-randomized-design/m-p/588216#M28795</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;JMP has a separate community. You can post JMP questions to&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Shortest-random-path-through-randomized-design/m-p/588216#M28795</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T13:35:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

