<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interpretation of calibration plot in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556429#M27632</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Calling&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13684"&gt;@Rick_SAS&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;. Rick have written several blogs about it .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 14:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-06T14:22:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interpretation of calibration plot</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556273#M27623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="cali.jpg" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/29213i3BD4E5FB00F7BC25/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="cali.jpg" alt="cali.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have attached an image of my calibration plot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My interpretation: When probability is about 0.6 and greater, predicted probabilities are close to or on target as it relates to the actual outcome, but below that probability they tend to be inaccurate in terms of predicting event?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 15:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556273#M27623</guid>
      <dc:creator>edasdfasdfasdfa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-05T15:52:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interpretation of calibration plot</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556299#M27625</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You should be asking WPS related questions to the WPS community.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 21:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556299#M27625</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-05T21:08:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interpretation of calibration plot</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556429#M27632</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Calling&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13684"&gt;@Rick_SAS&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;. Rick have written several blogs about it .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 14:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556429#M27632</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-06T14:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interpretation of calibration plot</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556435#M27633</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That looks like a decile calibration plot. You can read about &lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2018/05/16/decile-calibration-plots-sas.html" target="_self"&gt;the decile calibration plot and why many researchers do not recommend their use.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've written other articles about the loess-smoothed calibration plot:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- &lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2018/05/14/calibration-plots-in-sas.html" target="_self"&gt;How to create if you are running SAS/STAT prior to 15.1&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- &lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2019/02/20/easier-calibration-plot-sas.html" target="_self"&gt;How to create a calibration plot directly in PROC LOGISTIC in SAS?STAT 15.1 or later.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The first two links include a discussion of how to interpret the plots and references to the literature.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding your interpretation: yes, your interpretation seems correct. For low values of the predicted probabilities, the model seems inaccurate. I'd add that the very high predicted probabilities seem to have some issues as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 14:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpretation-of-calibration-plot/m-p/556435#M27633</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-06T14:34:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

