<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Significance statistics for tables with cells with 0 obs? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Significance-statistics-for-tables-with-cells-with-0-obs/m-p/59557#M2759</link>
    <description>Hi.I am not familiar with proc surveyfreq.&lt;BR /&gt;
But For your situation,It looks like the best way is to use exact analysis or drop/merge these problemed cells. Maybe also you can use Corresponding Analysis to see whether it is significant( But it is only referenced method).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
For McNemars ,it is only suited for paired data ,but it is also not suited for your situation.&lt;BR /&gt;
Chisquare Distribution is only used for enough freq ( &amp;gt; 5 for each cell ).&lt;BR /&gt;
So I highly recommend you to calculate exact probability distribution by exact analysis.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ksharp</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-29T01:36:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Significance statistics for tables with cells with 0 obs?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Significance-statistics-for-tables-with-cells-with-0-obs/m-p/59556#M2758</link>
      <description>I've been asked to produce significance statistics for a number of surveys with very small subgroups.  Some of the tables have 0 cells, and some have cells with less than 5 observations in them.  Normally I produce CHISQs out of SURVEYFREQ for categorical variables, weighted TTESTS for continuous variables, and output the stats via ODS and apply data-driven stars in my reports where appropriate.  In this case however, CHISQs are not appropriate for the small cells and just plain won't work for the 0 cells.  Does anyone have a work-around for this?  Any suggestions greatly appreciated.  (I tried McNemars for the 2 x 2 tables which work, no idea if they are appropriate - but McNemars doesn't work for the 2 x &amp;gt;2 tables - these are all comparisons of two groups.  Fishers won't work at all.  Wald Chis (like the other Chis) also won't work.)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:50:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Significance-statistics-for-tables-with-cells-with-0-obs/m-p/59556#M2758</guid>
      <dc:creator>louisehadden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-28T19:50:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Significance statistics for tables with cells with 0 obs?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Significance-statistics-for-tables-with-cells-with-0-obs/m-p/59557#M2759</link>
      <description>Hi.I am not familiar with proc surveyfreq.&lt;BR /&gt;
But For your situation,It looks like the best way is to use exact analysis or drop/merge these problemed cells. Maybe also you can use Corresponding Analysis to see whether it is significant( But it is only referenced method).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
For McNemars ,it is only suited for paired data ,but it is also not suited for your situation.&lt;BR /&gt;
Chisquare Distribution is only used for enough freq ( &amp;gt; 5 for each cell ).&lt;BR /&gt;
So I highly recommend you to calculate exact probability distribution by exact analysis.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ksharp</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Significance-statistics-for-tables-with-cells-with-0-obs/m-p/59557#M2759</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-29T01:36:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

