<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549421#M27426</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That worked!&amp;nbsp; Thanks, Paige!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;ods exclude all;
proc factor
	data = z1
		n = 3
		rotate = varimax;
	ods output OrthRotFactPat = z2;
run;
ods exclude none;



proc sort
	data = z2
		out = z3 (drop = variable);
	by descending 
		factor1;
run;



proc print
	data = z3 noobs;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Label&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor3&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Dramatic&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.83344&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.01713&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.19708&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Manipulative&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.78543&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.08145&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.04691&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Arrogant&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.67687&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.04548&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.10403&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Eccentric&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.54909&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.2988&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.1542&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Mistrustful&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.27123&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.68113&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.24104&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Passive-Agressive&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.05357&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.17009&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.61706&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Volatile&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.09984&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.79007&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.0159&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Detached&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.27916&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.18104&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.76462&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Perfectionist&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.3187&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.02075&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.06406&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Dependent&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.37995&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.33545&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.63903&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Cautious&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.65933&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.49985&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.02697&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 20:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>UniformVariance</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-08T20:36:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549143#M27407</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to use SAS to replicate a principal component analysis in SPSS, but I get different results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The data come from Task 18.4 in Chapter 18 of this website:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://milton-the-cat.rocks/home/dsus_alex.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;http://milton-the-cat.rocks/home/dsus_alex.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have attached both the SPSS and the SAS data files for this analysis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used the following code in SAS:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc factor
     data = z1
          n = 3;
     ods output FactorPattern = z2;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the&amp;nbsp;Factor Pattern matrix that I get.&amp;nbsp; I sorted the results by Factor1 in descending order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Label&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor3&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Dramatic&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.83152&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.00401&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.20573&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Manipulative&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.75924&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.15946&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.15446&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Arrogant&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.66808&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.14868&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.05109&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Eccentric&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.47807&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.41197&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.12763&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Mistrustful&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.13197&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.70229&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.29149&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Passive-Agressive&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.11345&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.52411&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.35355&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Volatile&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.24119&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.57074&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.50051&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Perfectionist&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.31997&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.00441&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.06086&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Detached&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.34426&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.59224&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.47549&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Dependent&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.40245&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.2419&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.6669&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Cautious&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.73911&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.27281&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.25414&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the rotated component matrix from SPSS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="pca rotated component matrix.png" style="width: 539px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28518i3CB53812D8E71881/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pca rotated component matrix.png" alt="pca rotated component matrix.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see, there is no exact match.&amp;nbsp; Furthermore, some of the values are entirely different.&amp;nbsp; Why is that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 02:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549143#M27407</guid>
      <dc:creator>UniformVariance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T02:08:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549265#M27413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is factor analysis ,NOT principal component analysis, Try&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;PRINCOMP Procedure .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 14:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549265#M27413</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T14:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549266#M27414</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is factor analysis ,NOT principal component analysis, Try PRINCOMP Procedure &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 13:55:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549266#M27414</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T13:55:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549287#M27415</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think PROC FACTOR defaults to principal components analysis when you use it that way.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can't compare rotated components to un-rotated components.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 14:53:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549287#M27415</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T14:53:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549290#M27416</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And depending on the particular procedure you can get slightly different results inside the same system by changing the order of variables on model statements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I worked in an SPSS shop we had on process that we worked with to identify key elements. After we got a candidate list the approach had us change the order of variables several times because several of the variables would usually change levels of "importance" depending on which position in the code they occupied&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; role but position:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;model y = a b c d e ; would yield different results for the variables than model y= c d e a b;&amp;nbsp; to use SAS generic code)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 14:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549290#M27416</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T14:58:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549293#M27417</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13884"&gt;@ballardw&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And depending on the particular procedure you can get slightly different results inside the same system by changing the order of variables on model statements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is not true for Principal Components Analysis in SAS. Although I have never done PCA in SPSS, there is nothing the PCA algorithm that was would cause an order of variable dependency, so I can't imagine any correctly programmed PCA algorithm to produce order effects, other than perhaps round-off error in the last decimal places.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;title "ORDER OF VARIABLES: Age Height Weight";
proc princomp data=sashelp.class;
	var age height weight;
run;

title "ORDER OF VARIABLES: Weight Height Age";
proc princomp data=sashelp.class;
	var weight height age;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 15:04:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549293#M27417</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T15:04:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549297#M27418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1) Doesn't PROC FACTOR perform PCA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63347/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_factor_sect028.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63347/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_factor_sect028.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I searched "PROC PRINCOMP vs PROC PCA" on Google, but I don't see any results.&amp;nbsp; How do they differ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 15:07:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549297#M27418</guid>
      <dc:creator>UniformVariance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T15:07:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549298#M27419</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah - thanks, Paige.&amp;nbsp; How, then, do I get the rotated components?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 15:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549298#M27419</guid>
      <dc:creator>UniformVariance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T15:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549339#M27422</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PROC FACTOR documentation:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmmvacdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_factor_toc.htm&amp;amp;locale=en"&gt;https://documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmmvacdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_factor_toc.htm&amp;amp;locale=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Use the ROTATE= option&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Although at that point, I don't know if the rotated factors from SAS will match the rotated factors from SPSS.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 18:15:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549339#M27422</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T18:15:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different results between SPSS and SAS for principal component analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549421#M27426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That worked!&amp;nbsp; Thanks, Paige!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;ods exclude all;
proc factor
	data = z1
		n = 3
		rotate = varimax;
	ods output OrthRotFactPat = z2;
run;
ods exclude none;



proc sort
	data = z2
		out = z3 (drop = variable);
	by descending 
		factor1;
run;



proc print
	data = z3 noobs;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Label&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Factor3&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Dramatic&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.83344&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.01713&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.19708&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Manipulative&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.78543&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.08145&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.04691&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Arrogant&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.67687&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.04548&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.10403&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Eccentric&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.54909&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.2988&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.1542&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Mistrustful&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.27123&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.68113&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.24104&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Passive-Agressive&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.05357&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.17009&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.61706&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Volatile&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.09984&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.79007&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.0159&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Detached&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.27916&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.18104&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.76462&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Perfectionist&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.3187&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.02075&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.06406&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Dependent&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.37995&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.33545&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.63903&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Cautious&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.65933&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.49985&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.02697&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 20:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Different-results-between-SPSS-and-SAS-for-principal-component/m-p/549421#M27426</guid>
      <dc:creator>UniformVariance</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-08T20:36:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

