<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic proc surveyreg and post-hoc comparisons in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-surveyreg-and-post-hoc-comparisons/m-p/58461#M2717</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have previously used proc glm to compare means of 2+ groups (1-way anova) and then requested a multiple comparisons test (sheffe's or tukeys) for pairwise comparisons. However, the current data I am analyzing requires the use of proc surveyreg (sample survey data) and I'm unsure how to go about getting the pairwise comparisons I need (there are 3 levels to the variable)--is there a similar option, or how do I go about testing which pairwise comparisons are significant, if I have an overall significant F test?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks very much in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-01T23:24:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>proc surveyreg and post-hoc comparisons</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-surveyreg-and-post-hoc-comparisons/m-p/58461#M2717</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have previously used proc glm to compare means of 2+ groups (1-way anova) and then requested a multiple comparisons test (sheffe's or tukeys) for pairwise comparisons. However, the current data I am analyzing requires the use of proc surveyreg (sample survey data) and I'm unsure how to go about getting the pairwise comparisons I need (there are 3 levels to the variable)--is there a similar option, or how do I go about testing which pairwise comparisons are significant, if I have an overall significant F test?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks very much in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-surveyreg-and-post-hoc-comparisons/m-p/58461#M2717</guid>
      <dc:creator>cc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-01T23:24:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>proc surveyreg and post-hoc comparisons</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-surveyreg-and-post-hoc-comparisons/m-p/58462#M2718</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Take a look at PROC MULTTEST, especially at the example adjusting p values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-surveyreg-and-post-hoc-comparisons/m-p/58462#M2718</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-05T20:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

