topic Re: Mediation: Causalmed vs Macro in Statistical Procedures

Mediation: Causalmed vs Macro

tamhane — Wed, 17 Oct 2018 20:44:15 GMT

Hi,

I was comparing the results of the PROC CAUSALMED procedure and the SAS macro given in the paper "Mediation Analysis Allowing for Exposure–Mediator Interactions and Causal Interpretation: Theoretical Assumptions and Implementation With SAS and SPSS Macros" by Valeri and VanderWeele.

Outcome=Binary

Exposure/Treatment=Binary

Mediator=Binary

All coded as 0 and 1.

However, the results obtained somewhat differ.

A] Program and Output of the macro

%mediation(data=anak23,yvar=BPControlBoth,avar=VL_LT200,mvar=MMAS_NonAdh,cvar=,a0=0,a1=1,m=0,yreg=logistic,mreg=logistic, interaction=false,casecontrol=,output=,c=,boot=,cens=);
run;

SAS Output

Obs Effect Estimate p_value _95__CI_lower _95__CI_upper1234

cde	2.25450	0.044196	1.02132	4.97666
nde	2.25450	0.044196	1.02132	4.97666
nie	1.22482	0.047073	1.00262	1.49627
total effect	2.76137	0.013251	1.23613	6.16857

SAS Output

Obs Effect Estimate1

proportion mediated

0.28777

B] Program and Output of the CAUSALMED

proc causalmed data=anak23;
model BPControlBoth = VL_LT200 MMAS_NonAdh;
mediator MMAS_NonAdh = VL_LT200;
run;

SAS Output

The CAUSALMED Procedure

Summary of Effects Estimate StandardError Wald 95%Confidence Limits Z Pr > |Z|Total EffectControlled Direct Effect (CDE)Natural Direct Effect (NDE)Natural Indirect Effect (NIE)Percentage MediatedPercentage Due to InteractionPercentage Eliminated

0.2299	0.0913	0.05089	0.4089	2.52	0.0118
0.1932	0.0908	0.01530	0.3711	2.13	0.0333
0.1932	0.0908	0.01530	0.3711	2.13	0.0333
0.0367	0.0191	-0.00078	0.07417	1.92	0.0550
15.9613	9.7584	-3.1648	35.0875	1.64	0.1019
0	.	.	.	.	.
15.9613	9.7584	-3.1648	35.0875	1.64	0.1019

Thanks.

Ashutosh

Re: Mediation: Causalmed vs Macro

tamhane — Wed, 17 Oct 2018 21:33:14 GMT

Just to highlight the results of the NIE and % mediated.

macro Causalmed

p-value 0.047 0.055

% mediated 28.78 15.96

Thanks.

Re: Mediation: Causalmed vs Macro

MichaelL_SAS — Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:50:57 GMT

I believe the issue is that the PROC CAUSALMED code does not specify that the outcome, mediator, and treatment are binary, so as a result the CAUSALMED procedure is modeling the outcome and mediator with a normal distribution not logistic regression. You can check if this is the case by looking at the "Model Information" table produced with the example code.

Specifying the mediator and treatment variables in the CLASS statement will indicate that they are binary and you can use the DIST=bin option in the MODEL statement to indicate the outcome is binary and should be modeled using logistic regression. The third example in the documentation for PROC CAUSALMED has an example of causal mediation analysis with treatment, outcome, and mediator, all binary.

https://go.documentation.sas.com/?docsetId=statug&docsetVersion=15.1&docsetTarget=statug_causalmed_examples03.htm&locale=en