<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Nonparametric test for a factorial desing (2 x 3) in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501902#M25844</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Because by using a Shapiro-Wilk test seems to be a not normal distribution&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This sentence is extremely difficult to understand. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The distribution of your data's&amp;nbsp;errors (not the distribution of the data itself) must be normal to do ANOVA. What do you think the distribution of the errors is? If you do an ANOVA and plot the residuals, do they have a normal distribution?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 13:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-05T13:45:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nonparametric test for a factorial desing (2 x 3)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501481#M25834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First of all, thanks for this support!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions: We have an experimental two factors design (3 different substrates and 2 different fungi) and I'm struggling to find how to use a nonparametric test to compare in such way:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Substrate &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Fungus 1 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Fungus 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; D5 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;X &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; D10 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;y &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; D15 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;z &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; z&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to compare Fungus 1 within different Substrates; Fungus 2&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;within different Substrates; Fungus 1 and Fungus 2 within the same substrate&amp;nbsp;(e.g. D5..)...&amp;nbsp;Any idea how to proceed&amp;nbsp;with this analysis?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fabricio.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501481#M25834</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vieira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-04T13:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nonparametric test for a factorial desing (2 x 3)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501720#M25839</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have replications? If so, what is your experimental design (e.g., completely randomized, split plot)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is your response variable, and what sort of values does it take?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why do you think you need a nonparametric test?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 02:05:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501720#M25839</guid>
      <dc:creator>sld</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-05T02:05:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nonparametric test for a factorial desing (2 x 3)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501900#M25843</link>
      <description>First of all, thank you for a quick reply.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Questions:&lt;BR /&gt;- Do you have replications? If so, what is your experimental design (e.g.,&lt;BR /&gt;completely randomized, split-plot)?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The experimental design is a completely randomized and each treatment have&lt;BR /&gt;10 replicates, ie., 3 different substrates * 2 different fungi = 6&lt;BR /&gt;treatments * 10 replicates = 60 experimental units.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- What is your response variable, and what sort of values does it take?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The response variable is the mushroom yield, i.e, the percentage of&lt;BR /&gt;mushroom (kg of mushroom/kg of the substrate * 100). The values are&lt;BR /&gt;presented in percentage.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- Why do you think you need a nonparametric test?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Because by using a Shapiro-Wilk test seems to be a not normal distribution&lt;BR /&gt;and I tried using the ANOVA and Tukey test. Since the Tukey test is used&lt;BR /&gt;for a parametric test I'm not sure how or which test can be used to verify&lt;BR /&gt;the data normality for 2 x 3 factorial design and if the dataset is not&lt;BR /&gt;normal what Post hoc test I can use for a factorial design and&lt;BR /&gt;nonparametric.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to discuss the data in that way if it is possible:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;*Substrate Fungus 1 Fungus 2*&lt;BR /&gt;D5 33 Aa 28 Ab&lt;BR /&gt;D10 29 Aa 27 Ba&lt;BR /&gt;D15 23 Ba 22 Ca&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Uppercase letter in the column (*Fungus 1* by varying the substrate and *Fungus&lt;BR /&gt;2* by varying the substrate).&lt;BR /&gt;Lowercase letter in the rows (*Fungus 1* and *Fungus 2* in the same&lt;BR /&gt;substrate).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PS: Here is how the dataset looks like:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Substrates Fungus Mush. Yield&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1 39.76&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1 34.18&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1 33.76&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1 33.52&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1 30.96&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1&lt;BR /&gt;35.85&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1&lt;BR /&gt;35.35&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1&lt;BR /&gt;27.18&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1&lt;BR /&gt;32.35&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F1&lt;BR /&gt;30.52&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2 33.91&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;33.75&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;33.27&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;36.48&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;25.77&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;21.60&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;35.93&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;31.71&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;30.90&lt;BR /&gt;D5 F2&lt;BR /&gt;35.38&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;31.40&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;33.17&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;22.27&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;23.15&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;34.10&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;30.58&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;30.62&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;31.48&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;32.37&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F1&lt;BR /&gt;44.06&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2 21.68&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;16.73&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;21.10&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;20.24&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;22.37&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;15.73&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;23.00&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;21.56&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;21.60&lt;BR /&gt;D10 F2&lt;BR /&gt;28.27&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1 32.42&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;27.46&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;32.22&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;15.78&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;31.40&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;28.87&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;25.47&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;34.32&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;19.03&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F1&lt;BR /&gt;20.68&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2 20.01&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;27.36&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;7.78&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;16.50&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;18.47&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;19.96&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;15.90&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;18.76&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;27.55&lt;BR /&gt;D15 F2&lt;BR /&gt;20.46&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks again!&lt;BR /&gt;Best,&lt;BR /&gt;Fabricio.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 13:41:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501900#M25843</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vieira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-05T13:41:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nonparametric test for a factorial desing (2 x 3)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501902#M25844</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Because by using a Shapiro-Wilk test seems to be a not normal distribution&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This sentence is extremely difficult to understand. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The distribution of your data's&amp;nbsp;errors (not the distribution of the data itself) must be normal to do ANOVA. What do you think the distribution of the errors is? If you do an ANOVA and plot the residuals, do they have a normal distribution?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 13:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501902#M25844</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-05T13:45:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nonparametric test for a factorial desing (2 x 3)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501903#M25845</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry about the mess in the previous post... here is how we would like to see the data:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Substrate &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Fungus 1 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Fungus 2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;D5 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;33 Aa &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 28 Ab&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;D10 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;29 Aa &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 27 Ba&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;D15 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;23 Ba &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 22 Ca&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Uppercase letter in the column (&lt;STRONG&gt;Fungus 1&lt;/STRONG&gt; by varying the substrate and &lt;STRONG&gt;Fungus 2&lt;/STRONG&gt; by varying the substrate).&lt;BR /&gt;Lowercase letter in the rows (&lt;STRONG&gt;Fungus 1&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;Fungus 2&lt;/STRONG&gt; in the same substrate).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks again!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Fabricio.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 13:46:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501903#M25845</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vieira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-05T13:46:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nonparametric test for a factorial desing (2 x 3)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501908#M25846</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Miller,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"This sentence is extremely difficult to understand."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry to not be clear enough and to make the mentioned sentence extremely difficult to understand. I don't know about the distribution of the errors but I can check that and I will. Should I use a factorial test (any specific?) and then run an ANOVA using a parametric test and check the distribution of the errors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fabricio.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 13:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501908#M25846</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vieira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-05T13:56:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nonparametric test for a factorial desing (2 x 3)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501913#M25847</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Run the standard 2-way ANOVA and check the distribution of the residuals.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:16:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nonparametric-test-for-a-factorial-desing-2-x-3/m-p/501913#M25847</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-05T14:16:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

