<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Non-inferiority. Farrington–Manning test extended to the Mantel–Haenszel type adjustment. in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Non-inferiority-Farrington-Manning-test-extended-to-the-Mantel/m-p/486539#M25227</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am facing the same question as well, have anybody has solution?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 05:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jack2012</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-14T05:38:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Non-inferiority. Farrington–Manning test extended to the Mantel–Haenszel type adjustment.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Non-inferiority-Farrington-Manning-test-extended-to-the-Mantel/m-p/430190#M22614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Sirs and Madams!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have faced with the following planned study:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The primary variable is the proportion of respondents.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The hypothesis is non-inferiority.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At the same time, stratification is planned for 2 factors, and this should be taken into account in the analysis of the primary variable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it real to perform the procedure "the Farrington–Manning test extended to the Mantel–Haenszel type adjustment" in SAS?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How to&amp;nbsp;use Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel weights for the stratum weights in the calculation of the CI (this method corresponds to the expanded Farrington-Manning test (Farrington CP and Manning G 1990) for stratified designs with Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel weights)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The data is attached.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Andrey&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Non-inferiority-Farrington-Manning-test-extended-to-the-Mantel/m-p/430190#M22614</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreyMyslivets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-23T22:05:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non-inferiority. Farrington–Manning test extended to the Mantel–Haenszel type adjustment.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Non-inferiority-Farrington-Manning-test-extended-to-the-Mantel/m-p/486539#M25227</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am facing the same question as well, have anybody has solution?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 05:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Non-inferiority-Farrington-Manning-test-extended-to-the-Mantel/m-p/486539#M25227</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jack2012</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-14T05:38:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

