<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Poor model fit with binary logistic regression in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Poor-model-fit-with-binary-logistic-regression/m-p/53179#M2450</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tend to agree with DLing here. Usually the issue lies with as DLing said - poorly gathered and/or irrelevant data. You need to ask yourself if the data collected is pertenent to the hypothesis you are testing. If so then maybe the poor fitting model is a sign that the variables you collected are not influencial to your dependent variable which could be a finding in of itself. There have been many times where I have seen clinical protocols that try to ask questions to with which the data collected cannot even answer. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>trekvana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-23T21:10:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor model fit with binary logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Poor-model-fit-with-binary-logistic-regression/m-p/53177#M2448</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, I am using a binary logistic regression to estimate for the dependent variable y (0, 1). Unfortunately there model has very predictive power. What is worse, the standardized deviance residuals does not follow the standard normal distribution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any remedy for this? I don't think I can find more predictive explanatory variables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should I try other GLM models with other distributions, instead of binomial?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:17:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Poor-model-fit-with-binary-logistic-regression/m-p/53177#M2448</guid>
      <dc:creator>bncoxuk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-23T19:17:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Poor model fit with binary logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Poor-model-fit-with-binary-logistic-regression/m-p/53178#M2449</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hard to say.&amp;nbsp; In practice, poor performing models is usually not a methodology issue as long as you've been relatively careful in approach.&amp;nbsp; Problem is far more likely with the data, or lack of good data pertaining to the issue at hand.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No amount of methodology research/experimentation/wizardry can overcome poorly gathered and/or irrelevant data.&amp;nbsp; Just my 2 cents worth.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Poor-model-fit-with-binary-logistic-regression/m-p/53178#M2449</guid>
      <dc:creator>DLing</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-23T19:38:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Poor model fit with binary logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Poor-model-fit-with-binary-logistic-regression/m-p/53179#M2450</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tend to agree with DLing here. Usually the issue lies with as DLing said - poorly gathered and/or irrelevant data. You need to ask yourself if the data collected is pertenent to the hypothesis you are testing. If so then maybe the poor fitting model is a sign that the variables you collected are not influencial to your dependent variable which could be a finding in of itself. There have been many times where I have seen clinical protocols that try to ask questions to with which the data collected cannot even answer. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Poor-model-fit-with-binary-logistic-regression/m-p/53179#M2450</guid>
      <dc:creator>trekvana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-23T21:10:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

