<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic interpreting coefficients fractional logit glimmix in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpreting-coefficients-fractional-logit-glimmix/m-p/468155#M24346</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am currently analyzing some DV which represents aproportion and a fractional logit model seems most appropriate. In addition to this, my data has a multilevel structure, implying that I include a random intercept (hhic, legal and age are measures at the group-level agency).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the syntax:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=consultations empirical;&lt;BR /&gt;class agency consultationtype(ref='1') complexitytext(ref="1") com_dummy(ref="0") format targetgroup;&lt;BR /&gt;model p_nonregulated=legal age hhic hhic*legal legal*age consultationtype complexitytext format duration l_mob_total&lt;BR /&gt;/dist=binomial link=logit solution;&lt;BR /&gt;random _residual_/subject=agency type=vc;&lt;BR /&gt;covtest/wald;&lt;BR /&gt;output out=predp pred(ilink)=p;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question concerns the interpretation of the coefficients, which I find difficult to interpret (in terms of change in the independent variable corresponds with variation in the dependent variable). More specifically, I have some coefficients which are pretty large (&amp;lt;3.00), although standard errors seems normal. My hunch is that this related to the scaling of the dependent and independent variable. Namely, the estimates where I have large coefficients concern covariates that range between 0 and 1 (HHIC is a proportion), while the esitmate (fixed effect) concerns how one unit change in the dependent variable shapes the outcome variable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See the output attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="branch"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:01:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>janbeyers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-06T18:01:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>interpreting coefficients fractional logit glimmix</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpreting-coefficients-fractional-logit-glimmix/m-p/468155#M24346</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am currently analyzing some DV which represents aproportion and a fractional logit model seems most appropriate. In addition to this, my data has a multilevel structure, implying that I include a random intercept (hhic, legal and age are measures at the group-level agency).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the syntax:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=consultations empirical;&lt;BR /&gt;class agency consultationtype(ref='1') complexitytext(ref="1") com_dummy(ref="0") format targetgroup;&lt;BR /&gt;model p_nonregulated=legal age hhic hhic*legal legal*age consultationtype complexitytext format duration l_mob_total&lt;BR /&gt;/dist=binomial link=logit solution;&lt;BR /&gt;random _residual_/subject=agency type=vc;&lt;BR /&gt;covtest/wald;&lt;BR /&gt;output out=predp pred(ilink)=p;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question concerns the interpretation of the coefficients, which I find difficult to interpret (in terms of change in the independent variable corresponds with variation in the dependent variable). More specifically, I have some coefficients which are pretty large (&amp;lt;3.00), although standard errors seems normal. My hunch is that this related to the scaling of the dependent and independent variable. Namely, the estimates where I have large coefficients concern covariates that range between 0 and 1 (HHIC is a proportion), while the esitmate (fixed effect) concerns how one unit change in the dependent variable shapes the outcome variable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See the output attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="branch"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:01:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpreting-coefficients-fractional-logit-glimmix/m-p/468155#M24346</guid>
      <dc:creator>janbeyers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-06T18:01:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

