<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Two-way MANOVA output interpretation in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Two-way-MANOVA-output-interpretation/m-p/464260#M24165</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;P&gt;rest of the output are screenshots in the attached word document.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some of us won't open Microsoft Office documents as they can be a security risk. Just post your screen captures directly into your message.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe that there are a couple of steps for this where one has to look first at some kind of correlation or interaction between the factors or something like that, but I could be wrong. I'll admit that I had a hard time grasping two-way ANOVA so that's probably why I'm struggling with this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No, there are no such steps. MANOVA will tell you about interactions and correlations, if they exist.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It sounds as if your problem is with understanding ANOVA, except that the rest of your message talks about interpreting MANOVA. Please ask specific questions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 01:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-23T01:29:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two-way MANOVA output interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Two-way-MANOVA-output-interpretation/m-p/463837#M24157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having trouble interpreting SAS output for a two-way MANOVA test for a class assignment. There are 2 factors ("S" and "V") and 4 predictor variables (y1-y4). Here is the SAS code I wrote, which I'm pretty sure is accurate:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glm data=snapbean;&lt;BR /&gt;class S V;&lt;BR /&gt;model y1 y2 y3 y4 = S V S*V;&lt;BR /&gt;manova h=_all_ / printe printh;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;test and comment on the main effects and interaction using all four MANOVA statistics.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The SAS output runs ANOVA on each predictor variable and I've omitted that output. The rest of the output are screenshots in the attached word document.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe that there are a couple of steps for this where one has to look first at some kind of correlation or interaction between the factors or something like that, but I could be wrong.&amp;nbsp; I'll admit that I had a hard time grasping two-way ANOVA so that's probably why I'm struggling with this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 17:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Two-way-MANOVA-output-interpretation/m-p/463837#M24157</guid>
      <dc:creator>phuzface</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-21T17:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two-way MANOVA output interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Two-way-MANOVA-output-interpretation/m-p/464260#M24165</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;P&gt;rest of the output are screenshots in the attached word document.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some of us won't open Microsoft Office documents as they can be a security risk. Just post your screen captures directly into your message.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe that there are a couple of steps for this where one has to look first at some kind of correlation or interaction between the factors or something like that, but I could be wrong. I'll admit that I had a hard time grasping two-way ANOVA so that's probably why I'm struggling with this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No, there are no such steps. MANOVA will tell you about interactions and correlations, if they exist.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It sounds as if your problem is with understanding ANOVA, except that the rest of your message talks about interpreting MANOVA. Please ask specific questions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 01:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Two-way-MANOVA-output-interpretation/m-p/464260#M24165</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-23T01:29:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

