<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: The impact of adding explanatory variables on significance (TSCSREG) in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/The-impact-of-adding-explanatory-variables-on-significance/m-p/13324#M240</link>
    <description>Thank you very much for your reply! This pretty much answers my question.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 13:29:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-03T13:29:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The impact of adding explanatory variables on significance (TSCSREG)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/The-impact-of-adding-explanatory-variables-on-significance/m-p/13322#M238</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This question pertains perhaps more to panel regression in general than to the SAS software in particular. Anyway, I thought the question might be relevant also to other SAS users (than just me).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm doing exploratory analyses with a panel data set. I'm testing the ability of a large number of constructs to explain an outcome. My question is: if an independent variable is deemed insignificant without controls, will it be insignificant with controls.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In other words: Does statistical significance decrease monotonically with increasing number of control variables?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I would like to use the following procedure:&lt;BR /&gt;
1. test a large number of interesting constructs: are they able to explain the outcome&lt;BR /&gt;
2. if so, include control variables to rule out alternative explanations&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is it possible that I will drop constructs at phase 1 that would turn out significant at phase 2?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/The-impact-of-adding-explanatory-variables-on-significance/m-p/13322#M238</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-30T06:47:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The impact of adding explanatory variables on significance (TSCSREG)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/The-impact-of-adding-explanatory-variables-on-significance/m-p/13323#M239</link>
      <description>In short, no.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In general, with linear models, that monotonic characteristic is displayed when the independent variables are all independent of one another.  Nice in theory, but doesn't always happen in practice.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That behavior is part of the reason that there are so many approaches to model building.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So, it is possible that your phase II will miss some interesting variables.  It is a variation on the Type II error in sample size computation.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 13:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/The-impact-of-adding-explanatory-variables-on-significance/m-p/13323#M239</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Duke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-03T13:09:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The impact of adding explanatory variables on significance (TSCSREG)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/The-impact-of-adding-explanatory-variables-on-significance/m-p/13324#M240</link>
      <description>Thank you very much for your reply! This pretty much answers my question.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 13:29:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/The-impact-of-adding-explanatory-variables-on-significance/m-p/13324#M240</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-03T13:29:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

