<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC MI : Differences between FCS REG and MONOTONE REG in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MI-Differences-between-FCS-REG-and-MONOTONE-REG/m-p/458651#M23940</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear grep2638,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm facing exactly the same problem as you... have you been able to solve it eventually ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best wishes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jonas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jonas_p</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-30T14:15:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC MI : Differences between FCS REG and MONOTONE REG</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MI-Differences-between-FCS-REG-and-MONOTONE-REG/m-p/374961#M19669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing simulations to test &lt;STRONG&gt;multiple imputation&lt;/STRONG&gt; procedures implemented in &lt;STRONG&gt;PROC MI&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For one of my datasets, I had the following &lt;STRONG&gt;error message&lt;/STRONG&gt; :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;ERROR: The set of classification levels for centre, generated for the imputed variable y_4, does &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;not include the level c3 for observations that have missing y_4 values.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It occured when I was imputing with the &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;MONOTONE REGRESSION&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; technique (on a monotone dataset, of course).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The &lt;STRONG&gt;code below&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;(on SAS V9.4) reproduces such error:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;DATA myData;
	INPUT centre $ y_1 y_2 y_3 y_4;
	DATALINES;
	c3 11 27 22 .
	c3 10 14 21 .
	c3 2 21 15 .
	c3 1 10 12 .
	c2 24 57 21 12
	c2 3 21 14 7
	c2 2 45 65 12
	c2 1 2 3 4
	c1 4 5 12 1
	c1 12 32 54 12
	c1 15 12 32 14
	c1 14 21 10 12
	;
RUN; 

PROC MI DATA=myData OUT=imputed;
	CLASS centre;
	VAR centre y_1 y_2 y_3 y_4;
	MONOTONE REG;
RUN;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;But with &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;FCS REGRESSION&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;, no problem !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;PROC MI DATA=myData OUT=imputed;
	CLASS centre;
	VAR centre y_1 y_2 y_3 y_4;
	FCS REG;
RUN;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yet, the &lt;STRONG&gt;SAS user guide &lt;/STRONG&gt;for PROC MI &amp;nbsp;(pdf version available &lt;A href="https://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/stat/141/mi.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;) seems to assert that for monotone datasets, &lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;FCS REGRESSION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;fill-in phase acts like a&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;MONOTONE REGRESSION&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; (page 5894 to 5895 and 5902 to 5903).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to explain that the error occurs only for &lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;MONOTONE REGRESSION&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:51:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MI-Differences-between-FCS-REG-and-MONOTONE-REG/m-p/374961#M19669</guid>
      <dc:creator>grep2638</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-11T13:51:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC MI : Differences between FCS REG and MONOTONE REG</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MI-Differences-between-FCS-REG-and-MONOTONE-REG/m-p/385641#M20041</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are exactly right. &amp;nbsp;With FCS, the problem should also surface. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suspect that this is an oversight in the development that does not catch the missing level and you should report it to Technical Support.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/ctx/supportform/createForm&amp;nbsp;" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/ctx/supportform/createForm&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MI-Differences-between-FCS-REG-and-MONOTONE-REG/m-p/385641#M20041</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-04T13:29:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC MI : Differences between FCS REG and MONOTONE REG</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MI-Differences-between-FCS-REG-and-MONOTONE-REG/m-p/458651#M23940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear grep2638,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm facing exactly the same problem as you... have you been able to solve it eventually ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best wishes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jonas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MI-Differences-between-FCS-REG-and-MONOTONE-REG/m-p/458651#M23940</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonas_p</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-30T14:15:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

